Testing standard

ASTM D2261

Standard Test Method for Tearing Strength of Fabrics by the Tongue (Single Rip) Procedure (Constant-Rate-of-Extension Tensile Testing Machine)

Written and technically reviewed by Dak System Inc. engineeringLast reviewed

ASTM D2261 measures tearing strength by the tongue, or single rip, procedure. A slit is cut to make two legs, the legs are clamped in opposing grips, and the tear is propagated along the fabric. The reported figure comes from the peaks of a jagged trace, because a tear advances yarn by yarn rather than smoothly.

At a glance

Test type
Teara cut or nick is forced to grow
Published by
ASTM
Edition
D2261-96

What the test does

A rectangular fabric specimen is cut with a slit down its centre, dividing one end into two legs. Each leg is clamped in an opposing grip, and the crosshead separates them so that the tear at the head of the slit is forced to travel along the fabric. Force is recorded against travel throughout. Because the tear advances by breaking yarns one after another rather than smoothly, the resulting trace is a saw-tooth, and the reported tearing strength is derived from its peaks rather than from an average across the whole record. Warp and weft specimens are cut and reported separately.

What it measures, and why it matters

The result is the force needed to keep a tear moving through the fabric. That is a different and often more useful question than tensile strength, because fabrics in service very rarely fail by being pulled evenly across their width. They get snagged on a fixing, cut by a sharp edge, or punctured — and what decides whether the article survives is whether that small damage spreads. A tarpaulin, a tent, an airbag, a lifting sling cover or a protective garment can have ample breaking strength and still be useless if a two-centimetre cut runs across it under load.

Specimen

A tear test is a controlled crack. The slit is the starting crack, and how cleanly it is cut decides where the tear goes.

Slit
Cut centrally to form two legsA ragged or off-centre slit sends the tear sideways out of the specimen.
Directions
Warp and weft tested separatelyA tear crossing warp yarns and one crossing weft are different failures.
Conditioning
21 ± 1 °C, 65 ± 2 % RH
Cut with a sharp precision blade
Every setDakA blunt blade crushes yarns at the slit tip and the tear starts from that damage rather than from geometry.
Reject an off-line tear
Where it runs to an edgeA tear that leaves the specimen has stopped measuring the fabric.

The result is read from the peaks, not the average. A tear advances by breaking yarns one after another, so the trace is a saw-tooth — averaging it reports mostly the troughs, where nothing was breaking.

Test speed

Rate
Commonly 50 to 300 mm/min per the specification
Reported value
Peak forces, averaged as the method directs
Watch the tear path
Throughout the runDakA tear curving toward an edge is about to invalidate the specimen.
Sample fast enough to catch the peaks
They are briefDakA data rate too low misses them and reports the fabric weaker than it is.

Calculations

Tearing strength

The average of the highest peaks over the tear length, in N

Which peaks and how many is set by the method. A mean of the whole trace understates the fabric substantially.

How the test runs

  1. 01Cut specimens in warp and weft directions.
  2. 02Cut the central slit with a sharp precision blade.
  3. 03Condition at 21 ± 1 °C and 65 ± 2 % RH.
  4. 04Fit flat grips with faces suited to the fabric.
  5. 05Clamp one leg in each grip, square and evenly.
  6. 06Pull at the specified rate, recording force against travel.
  7. 07Watch the tear path and reject any specimen tearing to an edge.
  8. 08Identify the peaks over the tear length.
  9. 09Average them as the method directs.
  10. 10Report warp and weft separately.

Grips and fixtures for this method

Pneumatic vice action grips with 25 mm square jaw faces
Standard 25 mm

Pneumatic Vice Action Grip

Pneumatic vice action grips clamp the full specimen width at a constant, even pressure — which is what stops one side slipping or tearing before the other.

Specifications
25 mm square vice action grip clamping a red film specimen
Rubber facedTJ-34

25mm Square Vice Action Grip

A 25 mm square vice grip suits the narrower specimen widths where a wide jaw is unnecessary.

Specifications

What the report has to contain

  • Reference to ASTM D2261 and the edition
  • Fabric identification and construction
  • Specimen dimensions and slit length
  • Direction — warp or weft — for each set
  • Conditioning atmosphere and duration
  • Rate of extension
  • Tearing strength for each specimen
  • Number rejected for off-line tears
  • Mean, standard deviation and coefficient of variation

What the machine must be capable of

Low forces measured well — commonly between a few newtons and a few hundred — so resolution at the bottom of the load cell's range matters more than capacity. The crosshead must hold the specified rate, and the data acquisition rate matters more here than in most tensile work: the peaks that constitute the result are brief, each being a single yarn letting go, and a sampling rate too low will skim over them and report a fabric weaker than it is. Grips need wide flat faces and an even clamp across each leg, because a leg held unevenly twists as it is pulled and the tear wanders out of line.

What goes wrong in practice

Averaging the whole trace rather than reading its peaks is the most consequential analytical error, and it understates the fabric by a wide margin because most of the record is the trough between yarn breaks. Off-line tears are the commonest cause of a rejected specimen, and they almost always trace back to the slit rather than the machine. A data rate too low to catch brief peaks produces a quiet, consistent underestimate that looks like a material property. And testing in the general laboratory atmosphere rather than the textile one biases every result on any fabric containing natural or regenerated fibre.

Tongue tear or trapezoid tear

ASTM D2261 tongueASTM D4533 trapezoid
Tear pathAlong the specimen, yarn by yarnAcross a marked trapezoid
Best suited toWoven apparel and technical fabricsGeotextiles and nonwovens
TraceSaw-toothed, read from peaksUsually a single peak
Typical failureTear wanders off-lineGrips slip on a stiff fabric

Different geometries suiting different materials, and not convertible. A specification naming one is not satisfied by the other.

Questions we are asked about this test

What is ASTM D2261?

It is the ASTM tongue, or single rip, tear test for fabrics. A slit is cut to form two legs, the legs are clamped in opposing grips, and the tear is propagated along the fabric while force is recorded. The reported tearing strength comes from the peaks in that trace.

Why is the result taken from peaks rather than the average?

Because a tear does not advance smoothly. It breaks one yarn, the force drops, load builds again against the next, and it breaks — so the trace is a saw-tooth. The peaks are the yarns actually resisting; the troughs are the moments between. Averaging the whole trace reports mostly troughs and understates the fabric substantially.

Why does tear strength matter more than tensile strength for some fabrics?

Because fabrics in service rarely fail by being pulled evenly. They get snagged, cut or punctured, and what decides the outcome is whether that small damage spreads. A tarpaulin, an airbag, a tent or a protective garment can have ample tensile strength and still be useless if a small cut runs.

What do I do if the tear runs to the edge?

Reject the specimen and re-run. Once the tear leaves the intended path it has stopped measuring the fabric and is describing the specimen geometry instead. Off-line tears usually trace back to a slit that was ragged or off-centre, so the fix is at the cutting stage rather than the machine.

Why must warp and weft be reported separately?

Because they are different failures. A tear travelling in one direction has to break the yarns running across it, so a warp-direction tear breaks weft yarns and vice versa. Resistance depends on which set is being broken and how tightly they are held, and the two figures commonly differ substantially.

Why the 21 °C and 65 % RH atmosphere?

It is the textile standard atmosphere, and it differs from the 23 °C and 50 % RH used for plastics. Natural and regenerated fibres change strength appreciably with moisture regain, so testing in the wrong atmosphere produces a consistent bias. It is among the easiest mistakes for a general-purpose laboratory to make.

Does the data acquisition rate matter?

More than in most tensile work. The peaks that constitute the result are brief — each is one yarn letting go — so a sampling rate too low will skim over them and report a fabric weaker than it is. It produces a quiet, consistent underestimate with nothing in the trace to reveal it.

Running ASTM D2261 on the Series 7200 and Series 9000

Dak verifies against whichever standard the method names, and where a class applies our frames sit a class tighter than it asks.

The method asks forDak supplies
CapacityLow — commonly 5 N to 300 N, and the peak is what is reported rather than the meanLoad cells from 1 kg to 60 ton on the Series 7200, and 0.5 to 100 kN on the Series 9000
Force accuracyASTM E4Verified to ASTM E4, and to ISO 7500-1 Class 0.5
GrippingFlat-faced grips holding the two legs of a slit specimen, pulled apart to propagate a tearWedge, vice-action, pneumatic and hydraulic grips, built to the specimen
Environment21 ± 1 °C and 65 ± 2 % RH — the textile standard atmosphere, not the 23/50 used elsewhere3009 series chambers, −150 °C to +400 °C — temperature only

This page describes the method as practised. The governing text is the current edition from the issuing body. Tell us what you are testing and we will answer with the machine, the fixture and a quotation.