Testing standard

ISO 13937-2

Textiles — Tear properties of fabrics — Part 2: Determination of tear force of trouser-shaped test specimens (Single tear method)

Written and technically reviewed by Dak System Inc. engineeringLast reviewed

ISO 13937-2 measures tear force using a trouser-shaped specimen: a slit cut up the middle leaves two legs which are pulled in opposite directions, tearing the fabric along the slit. It is the single tear method, and the reported force comes from peaks in a saw-toothed trace rather than from an average.

At a glance

Test type
Teara cut or nick is forced to grow
Published by
ISO
Edition
ISO 13937-2:2000

What the test does

A rectangular fabric specimen is cut with a slit up its centre, dividing one end into two legs — the shape that gives the method its name. Each leg is clamped in an opposing grip and the crosshead separates them at 100 mm/min, so the fabric tears along the line of the slit. Force is recorded against travel throughout. Because the tear advances by breaking yarns one at a time, the trace is a saw-tooth, and the reported tear force is derived from its peaks over the tear length rather than from an average of the whole record. Warp and weft specimens are cut and reported separately.

What it measures, and why it matters

The result is the force required to keep a tear running through the fabric once it has started. That is the property that decides whether damage stays local or spreads, and it is a different question from breaking strength entirely. Almost nothing in service fails by being pulled evenly across its width: a tarpaulin catches on a hook, a workwear garment snags on a bracket, a technical textile is nicked during installation. Whether the article survives depends on whether that small cut propagates under load, and that is what this test measures.

Specimen

The trouser shape is the whole method. Two legs pulled apart force the tear along a defined line, and everything else exists to keep it there.

Shape
Rectangular with a central slit forming two legsThe legs are pulled in opposite directions, which is what gives the shape its name.
Slit length
As the standard specifies
Directions
Warp and weft tested separately
Conditioning
Textile standard atmosphere
Mark the expected tear line
Before testingDakIt makes an off-line tear obvious as it happens rather than after the trace has been recorded.
Cut the slit with a sharp blade
Every setDak

A specimen whose tear deviates from the slit line is void. It has stopped measuring the fabric and started measuring the specimen's geometry.

Test speed

Rate of extension
100 mm/min
Reported value
Peak forces over the tear length
Discard the initial rise
Before the tear is running
Sample fast
The peaks are briefDak

Calculations

Tear force

Computed from the peak forces recorded over the tear length, in N

Which peaks are used and how they are combined is set by the standard. Reporting a mean of the whole record understates the fabric.

How the test runs

  1. 01Cut trouser-shaped specimens in warp and weft directions.
  2. 02Cut the central slit to the specified length with a sharp blade.
  3. 03Mark the expected tear line.
  4. 04Condition in the textile standard atmosphere.
  5. 05Clamp one leg in each grip, square and evenly.
  6. 06Separate at 100 mm/min, recording force against travel.
  7. 07Watch the tear against the marked line.
  8. 08Void any specimen whose tear deviates.
  9. 09Take the peaks over the tear length.
  10. 10Combine them as the standard directs.
  11. 11Report warp and weft separately.

Grips and fixtures for this method

Pneumatic vice action grips with 25 mm square jaw faces
Standard 25 mm

Pneumatic Vice Action Grip

Pneumatic vice action grips clamp the full specimen width at a constant, even pressure — which is what stops one side slipping or tearing before the other.

Specifications
25 mm square vice action grip clamping a red film specimen
Rubber facedTJ-34

25mm Square Vice Action Grip

A 25 mm square vice grip suits the narrower specimen widths where a wide jaw is unnecessary.

Specifications

What the report has to contain

  • Reference to ISO 13937-2 and the edition
  • Fabric identification and construction
  • Specimen dimensions and slit length
  • Direction for each result set
  • Conditioning atmosphere and duration
  • Rate of extension
  • Tear force for each specimen
  • Number of specimens voided for deviation
  • Mean, standard deviation and coefficient of variation

What the machine must be capable of

Low forces measured accurately — commonly between a few newtons and a couple of hundred — so resolution at the low end of the load cell matters more than capacity, and accuracy to ISO 7500-1 Class 1 is needed over the range actually used. The crosshead must hold 100 mm/min. As with all tear testing, the data acquisition rate is more critical than in ordinary tensile work: each peak is a single yarn letting go, and a sampling rate too low skims over them and reports a fabric weaker than it is. Grips need wide flat faces and an even clamp across each leg.

What goes wrong in practice

Tears deviating from the slit line are the commonest cause of a voided specimen, and they usually originate in the cutting rather than the machine. Reading an average from the trace instead of its peaks understates the fabric by a wide margin, because most of the record is the trough between yarn breaks. A sampling rate too low to catch brief peaks does the same thing more quietly, with nothing in the data to reveal it. And treating a Part 1 pendulum figure as comparable with a Part 2 force is a category error — one is an energy, the other a force.

The four parts of ISO 13937

Part 1Part 2Part 3Part 4
MethodBallistic pendulum (Elmendorf)Trouser, single tearWing-shapedTongue-shaped, double tear
ApparatusPendulum testerTensile machineTensile machineTensile machine
ReadsEnergy absorbedForce peaksForce peaksForce peaks

Part 1 uses a pendulum and measures energy; the other three use a tensile machine and measure force. A pendulum result and a tensile-machine result are not comparable, and a specification naming a part means that part.

Questions we are asked about this test

What is ISO 13937-2?

It is Part 2 of the ISO fabric tear family: the single tear method using a trouser-shaped specimen. A slit up the middle of a rectangular specimen leaves two legs, which are clamped in opposing grips and pulled apart at 100 mm/min so the fabric tears along the slit.

Why is it called trouser-shaped?

Because the slit divides one end of the specimen into two legs, and the specimen mounted in the machine looks like a pair of trousers with a leg in each grip. It is a description of the geometry rather than of anything about the fabric.

How does it differ from Part 1?

Part 1 is the ballistic pendulum, or Elmendorf, method — a swinging pendulum tears the fabric and the energy absorbed is read from the swing. It needs a dedicated instrument and reports energy. Parts 2, 3 and 4 all use an ordinary tensile machine and report force. A pendulum result and a tensile-machine result are not comparable.

Why must an off-line tear be voided?

Because once the tear leaves the slit line it is no longer travelling through the fabric in the way the method intends — it is following whatever weakness or geometry drew it aside. The number that results describes that path rather than the material. Marking the expected line before testing makes the deviation obvious as it happens.

Why 100 mm/min specifically?

It is the rate the standard sets, and rate matters because most fabrics are at least somewhat rate-sensitive: tear faster and the recorded force generally rises. Fixing it at 100 mm/min is what allows two laboratories to compare results at all, which is why it is not a parameter to adjust for convenience.

Which part should I specify for a new fabric?

Whichever your customer's specification names — that is the only answer that matters commercially. If you are choosing freely, Part 2 is the most widely used of the tensile-machine methods and needs no special apparatus, which makes it the practical default.

How does it compare with ASTM D2261?

They are close in principle: both propagate a tear along a slit using a tensile machine and both read the result from force peaks. The specimen geometry and the rate differ, so the figures should not be pooled, and a certificate should name the method actually run rather than describing the family.

Running ISO 13937-2 on the Series 7200 and Series 9000

Dak verifies against whichever standard the method names, and where a class applies our frames sit a class tighter than it asks.

The method asks forDak supplies
CapacityLow — commonly 5 N to 200 N, reported from the peaks of a jagged traceLoad cells from 1 kg to 60 ton on the Series 7200, and 0.5 to 100 kN on the Series 9000
Force accuracyISO 7500-1 Class 1 over the working rangeISO 7500-1 Class 0.5 — a class tighter than the method asks
GrippingFlat-faced grips holding the two legs of a trouser-shaped specimenWedge, vice-action, pneumatic and hydraulic grips, built to the specimen
Environment21 ± 1 °C and 65 ± 2 % RH — the textile standard atmosphere, not the 23/50 used elsewhere3009 series chambers, −150 °C to +400 °C — temperature only

This page describes the method as practised. The governing text is the current edition from the issuing body. Tell us what you are testing and we will answer with the machine, the fixture and a quotation.