Testing standard
Standard Test Method for Tear Strength of Conventional Vulcanized Rubber and Thermoplastic Elastomers
Written and technically reviewed by Dak System Inc. engineeringLast reviewed
ASTM D624 measures the tear strength of vulcanised rubber and thermoplastic elastomers. A die-cut test piece is pulled until a tear runs through it, and the force divided by the thickness at the tear path is the reported tear strength. Five die geometries are defined and each produces its own number, so results only compare between compounds tested with the same die.
From the test method to your testing system
Explore the DAK machines already listed for ASTM D624, then review the grips, measurement and setup requirements below.
Universal Testing MachineSeries 7200Explore the machine →
Universal Testing MachineSeries 9000Explore the machine →01Understand the method
A rubber test piece cut with one of five dies is clamped at both ends and pulled apart at a constant crosshead speed until a tear runs through it. Nothing rotates, and nothing is attached to the specimen. The machine records force against crosshead travel; the force at which the tear starts or advances, divided by the measured thickness at the tear path, is the reported tear strength.
One property is reported: tear strength, force per unit thickness, taken from the peak force for the crescent and angle geometries and from the propagation force for the trouser and constrained-path ones. It is a batch-release number for vulcanised compounds, a ranking tool when filler loading or cure state is changed, and a design input for parts that live with cut edges, mould flash or a nicked seal lip. It also settles field failures, where the question is whether a small cut grew. The figure is geometry-dependent, so it compares compounds tested with the same die and nothing else.
02Prepare the specimen and test settings
This is the fact that governs everything else about the method: the geometry is not a detail of the specimen, it is part of the definition of the property.
Tear strength is geometry-dependent. A Die C figure and a Die T figure for the same compound are different numbers describing different things, and neither converts to the other. A specification that names a tear strength without naming a die has not specified anything.
03Build the test setup on a DAK machine
Tear forces are small. A nominally 2.3 mm Die C specimen of ordinary rubber tears at roughly 20 N to 300 N, and only the toughest compounds approach 500 N, so clean resolution at the bottom of the scale matters far more than frame capacity; load cells from 100 N to 2 kN cover this work, and a 50 kN cell reads the whole test as noise. The method itself fixes no accuracy class, so the frame's force verification and the cell's low-end linearity carry the burden.
Speed is set by geometry: 500 ± 50 mm/min for Types A, B and C, 50 ± 5 mm/min for Types T and CP. Rubber is rate-sensitive, so running the wrong one of those two speeds gives a different number rather than a noisier one.
No extensometer and no strain measurement are required — only force and thickness. The demand falls on travel instead: trouser and constrained-path tears must be followed through the full propagation length, and soft compounds add large leg extension on top, so the frame needs long crosshead travel.
Grips must tighten as tension rises and press evenly across the gripping area. Pneumatic side-action grips are the usual answer, with self-tightening wedge and roller grips accepted alternatives. Faces must be wider than the specimen — 25 mm for Types A, B, C and CP, 30 mm for Type T — flat rubber faces for soft or easily damaged compounds, serrated or diamond faces for thick tough ones. For Types T and CP the two legs are clamped one per grip, symmetric about the machine axis. No dedicated tear fixture is needed beyond the grips; the geometry lives in the cutting die. Ambient testing needs no chamber; only non-ambient temperatures do.
Flat vice-action faces hold a die-cut rubber piece squarely at low force without pre-stressing it — the requirement here is a square, slip-free hold rather than the self-tightening action a tensile dumb-bell needs.
SpecificationsDak verifies against whichever standard the method names, and where a class applies our frames sit a class tighter than it asks.
| The method asks for | Dak supplies | |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | Tear forces are small. A nominally 2.3 mm thick Die C specimen of ordinary rubber tears at roughly 20–300 N, and only the toughest compounds approach 500 N, so clean resolution at the bottom of a 500 N or 1 kN load cell matters far more than frame capacity; equipment vendors commonly fit 100 N to 2 kN cells for this work. | Load cells from 1 kg to 60 ton on the Series 7200, and 0.5 to 100 kN on the Series 9000 |
| Force accuracy | unknown | ISO 7500-1 Class 0.5 — the method sets no class of its own |
| Gripping | Self-tightening tensile grips (pneumatic side-action, wedge or roller) with faces wider than the specimen; geometry supplied by the Type A/B/C/T/CP cutting die, not by a fixture | Our vice-action grips or self-tightening serrated wedge grips, with V-jaws for round specimens, built to the specimen |
| Environment | Ambient — condition and test at the standard test temperature of 23 ± 2 °C (ASTM D1349); an environmental chamber only for non-ambient test temperatures | 3009 series chambers, −150 °C to +400 °C — temperature only |
04Run the test
05Calculate, report and interpret
Ts = F / d
Force per unit THICKNESS, not per unit area — kN/m or N/mm. There is no cross-section here because the specimen does not fail across one.
Knotty tearing is the common one: the tear advances in stick-slip jerks and the trace returns saw-toothed, so which peak the operator reads changes the answer. Nick depth is next — a blunt blade or a nick cut too deep moves where the tear starts, and the scatter follows it. Soft compounds creep out of under-clamped grips, adding travel and losing force. Grain is the invisible one: cut every specimen the same way from a milled sheet and a direction-dependent compound reads as an isotropic one.
06Compare methods and find answers
| ASTM D624 | ISO 34-1 | ASTM D412 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Measures | Tear strength | Tear strength | Tensile strength and elongation |
| Failure mode | A tear along a path | A tear along a path | Rupture across a section |
| Result units | Force per thickness, kN/m | Force per thickness, kN/m | Force per area, MPa |
| Geometry dependence | Total — five dies, five answers | Total — trouser, angle, crescent | Low, within a die |
| Comparable across geometries | No | No | Broadly, within a die |
ISO 34-1 is the nearest counterpart and shares the principle, but the pieces and rates differ so the figures are not interchangeable. The deeper point applies to both: tear strength is a property of the compound AND the geometry together, which tensile strength very nearly is not.
It is the ASTM method for tear strength of vulcanised rubber and thermoplastic elastomers. A die-cut piece is pulled until a tear runs through it, and the force divided by the thickness at the tear path is the tear strength. Five die geometries are defined and each gives its own number.
Whichever the material specification names — this is not an operator's choice. Die C, the unnicked 90° angle, is the most commonly specified. Die T, the trouser, reports a propagation force rather than a peak and answers a different question about how an existing tear grows. The die must appear on the report, because the numbers do not convert between geometries.
Because the specimen does not fail across a cross-section. A tear runs along a path, and the only meaningful dimension resisting it is the thickness through which it has to travel. That is why the units are kN/m or N/mm rather than MPa, and why the thickness is measured at the tear path specifically.
They measure different failure modes. D412 pulls a dumb-bell until it ruptures across its section and reports a stress in MPa; D624 propagates a tear along a path and reports a force per thickness. A compound can be strong in tension and tear easily, which is exactly why both tests exist and why neither substitutes for the other.
A small one. A nominally 2.3 mm Die C specimen of ordinary rubber tears at roughly 20 N to 300 N, and only the toughest compounds approach 500 N. Cells from 100 N to 2 kN cover this work, and clean resolution at the bottom of the scale matters far more than capacity — a 50 kN cell reads the whole test as noise.
Two common causes. A burred cutting die leaves an edge that seeds a competing tear, so the piece fails early along a path the method did not intend. And slow data capture rounds off the brief peak that a crescent or angle die produces, which under-reports the maximum. Both errors are systematic and both push the result in the same direction.
The result is unusable and the piece is discarded rather than recorded. A tear that wanders has measured the geometry of its own path rather than the compound's resistance, and averaging it in with valid results simply drags the mean toward a number that describes nothing.
Discuss your specimen, test requirements and reporting needs with DAK engineering.
This page describes the method as practised. The governing text is the current edition from the issuing body. Tell us what you are testing and we will answer with the machine, the fixture and a quotation.
