Testing standard

ASTM D1938

Standard Test Method for Tear-Propagation Resistance (Trouser Tear) of Plastic Film and Thin Sheeting by a Single-Tear Method

Written and technically reviewed by Dak System Inc. engineeringLast reviewed

ASTM D1938 measures the force needed to propagate an existing tear through plastic film and thin sheeting no more than 1 mm thick, using a single-tear trouser geometry. It is explicitly not applicable to materials that fail in a brittle manner during the test.

At a glance

Test type
Teara cut or nick is forced to grow
Published by
ASTM
Edition
D1938-19

What the test does

A conditioned specimen of film or thin sheeting no more than 1 mm thick is measured for thickness and slit to form two legs. The slit is cut with a fresh sharp blade in a single pass, because a blunt one drags and pre-damages the film ahead of the cut so the tear starts from that damage instead. One leg is gripped in each jaw and they are separated at a constant rate while the full force trace is recorded. The propagation force is read from the trace, and machine and transverse directions are tested separately.

What it measures, and why it matters

How much force keeps a tear running once it exists — which is not the same question as how hard the film is to tear in the first place. The slit is cut before the test starts, so initiation is deliberately excluded. That distinction has real consequences in packaging: a film can resist starting a tear and then propagate one very easily, which is precisely the behaviour behind a bag that seems robust until someone nicks the edge, after which it opens across its whole width. Directionality compounds it, since oriented films tear far more readily along the draw direction than across it.

Propagation, not initiation

The tear already exists when the test begins. What is measured is how much force keeps it running.

Thickness limit
1 mm (0,04 in) or lessA scope limit, not a guideline. Thicker sheeting is outside the method.
Geometry
Single-tear trouser — a slit forms two legs
Not applicable
Where brittle failures occur during testingIf the film snaps rather than tears, the method does not describe what happened.
What is measured
The force to propagate an existing tearInitiation is a different property and this test does not measure it.
Directions
Machine and transverse, separatelyBlown and cast films are strongly oriented, and tear resistance follows that orientation.
Cut the initial slit with a fresh sharp blade
DakA blunt blade drags and pre-damages the film ahead of the slit, and the tear then starts from that damage.

Film tear is strongly directional and often dramatically so. Some oriented films tear at a small fraction of the force in one direction that they need in the other, which is a design feature in easy-open packaging and a defect everywhere else.

Test speed

Rate
A constant rate of grip separation as specified
Reported
The propagation force, read from the trace
Trace
Retained — film tear traces are rarely smooth
Discard specimens where the tear left the intended path
DakA tear that curves into a leg has stopped propagating along the specimen and its force is not comparable.

Calculations

Tear propagation resistance

The force required to keep the tear running, from the trace

Reported as a force in this method. ISO 6383-1 divides by thickness and reports N/mm, so the two are not directly comparable.

Why the legs must not stretch much

Energy spent deforming the legs is not energy spent tearing

On a very extensible film much of the crosshead work goes into stretching the legs, and the measured force stops describing the tear.

How the test runs

  1. 01Condition the film as specified.
  2. 02Confirm the thickness is 1 mm or less.
  3. 03Measure and record the thickness.
  4. 04Cut specimens in the machine and transverse directions.
  5. 05Cut the initial slit with a fresh sharp blade in one pass.
  6. 06Fit pneumatic grips and set a pressure that holds film without cutting it.
  7. 07Mount one leg in each jaw.
  8. 08Separate at the specified constant rate.
  9. 09Record the full force trace as the tear propagates.
  10. 10Determine the propagation force by the method's rule.
  11. 11Discard specimens that failed in a brittle manner or whose tear left the path.

The fixture this method needs

Pneumatic vice action grips with 25 mm square jaw faces
Standard 25 mm

Pneumatic Vice Action Grip

Pneumatic vice action grips clamp the full specimen width at a constant, even pressure — which is what stops one side slipping or tearing before the other.

Specifications

What the report has to contain

  • Reference to ASTM D1938 and the edition
  • Film identification, composition and process — blown, cast or extruded
  • Measured thickness
  • Direction tested
  • Conditioning atmosphere
  • Rate of grip separation
  • Propagation force for each specimen
  • Mean and variability by direction
  • Any specimen showing brittle failure
  • Number discarded and why

What the machine must be capable of

Very low forces and steady slow travel. Propagation forces are commonly well under ten newtons, so the load cell is chosen for the film rather than for the frame — a cell sized for the machine works far below the range its accuracy class covers, and the verified range matters as much as the tolerance. Grips must hold thin, slippery film without cutting it, and hold it for the whole length of the tear rather than only at the start, since a tear runs for a considerable distance.

What goes wrong in practice

Quoting a value without the standard, when ISO 6383-1 divides by thickness and this method does not, so the two produce different numbers in different units on the same film. Averaging machine and transverse directions on a material engineered to be directional. Using a blunt blade for the initial slit. Averaging in specimens that failed in a brittle manner, which the scope excludes. And reading a propagation result as though it described how easily a tear begins, which is the error the companion Graves method exists to prevent.

ASTM D1938 or ISO 6383-1

ASTM D1938ISO 6383-1
GeometryTrouser, single tearTrouser
ReportedA forceTear resistance in N/mm
ThicknessUp to 1 mmLess than 1 mm
Directly comparableNo — one is normalised, the other is notNo

The same geometry with different reporting. ISO divides by thickness and ASTM does not, so a figure quoted without its standard cannot be interpreted — and the numbers will not match even on the same film.

Questions we are asked about this test

What is ASTM D1938?

It is the ASTM trouser tear test for plastic film and thin sheeting, measuring the force needed to propagate a tear that has already been started. A slit is cut to form two legs, one is gripped in each jaw, and they are separated at a constant rate while the force is recorded. It applies to material 1 mm thick or less.

Does it measure how easily a tear starts?

No, and the distinction matters. The slit is cut before the test begins, so what is measured is entirely how much force keeps an existing tear running. Resistance to initiation is a separate property — a film can be hard to start tearing and then run very easily, which is exactly the behaviour that makes a notched package fail dramatically once someone nicks it.

Why does the standard exclude brittle failures?

Because if the film snaps rather than tearing, the trouser geometry has stopped describing what happened. A brittle failure runs at a speed and by a mechanism the method does not model, and the recorded force is not a propagation resistance. The exclusion is a scope limit rather than a judgement about the material, and a specimen behaving that way should be reported rather than averaged in.

Why does leg stretch matter?

Because energy spent stretching the legs is energy not spent tearing. On a very extensible film, much of the work the crosshead does goes into deforming the two legs rather than advancing the tear, and the measured force stops being a clean description of tear resistance. It is the same limitation ISO 6383-1 states explicitly in its own scope.

Why is film tear so directional?

Because blown and cast films are oriented by the process that made them — the polymer chains align along the direction of draw. Tear runs easily along that alignment and with difficulty across it, and the difference can be large. It is deliberately exploited in easy-open packaging, where a film is engineered to tear straight in one direction, and it is a defect everywhere else.

Can I compare a D1938 result with ISO 6383-1?

Not directly. Both use a trouser geometry, but ISO 6383-1 divides the force by the specimen thickness and reports a tear resistance in newtons per millimetre, whereas D1938 reports a force. The numbers are in different units and will not match on the same film, so the standard has to be quoted with the value.

What load cell does this need?

A small one. Film tear propagation forces are commonly well under ten newtons, so a cell sized for the frame will be working far below the range its accuracy class covers. As with all low-force work, the certificate's verified range matters as much as its tolerance.

Running ASTM D1938 on the Series 7200 and Series 9000

Dak verifies against whichever standard the method names, and where a class applies our frames sit a class tighter than it asks.

The method asks forDak supplies
CapacityVery low — film tear propagation forces are commonly well under 10 NLoad cells from 1 kg to 60 ton on the Series 7200, and 0.5 to 100 kN on the Series 9000
Force accuracyVerified at the actual tear force, not at frame capacityISO 7500-1 Class 0.5, verified to ASTM E4, DIN 51221 and BS 1610
GrippingGrips taking the two legs of the trouser specimen, one in each jawWedge, vice-action, pneumatic and hydraulic grips, built to the specimen
Environment23 ± 2 °C standard laboratory atmosphere3009 series chambers, −150 °C to +400 °C — temperature only

This page describes the method as practised. The governing text is the current edition from the issuing body. Tell us what you are testing and we will answer with the machine, the fixture and a quotation.

Materials tested to it

The test it standardises

Other standards explained