Testing standard

ASTM D3039

Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials

Written and technically reviewed by Dak System Inc. engineeringLast reviewed

ASTM D3039 is the tensile test for polymer matrix composites. A straight-sided coupon cut from a cured laminate, usually with bonded end tabs, is pulled until it breaks. It reports ultimate tensile strength and strain, chord modulus taken between 1000 and 3000 microstrain, and Poisson's ratio — the ply-level inputs that go straight into laminate theory and finite-element models.

At a glance

Test type
Tensilethe specimen is pulled apart
Published by
ASTM
Edition
D3039/D3039M-17

What the test does

A straight-sided rectangular coupon, cut from a cured laminated panel and usually carrying bonded end tabs, is clamped at both ends in wedge grips. The crosshead pulls it along its axis at a constant rate until it breaks. Force, crosshead displacement and strain from an extensometer are recorded throughout, so the whole stress–strain response is captured rather than the breaking load alone.

What it measures, and why it matters

The method reports ultimate tensile strength and strain, chord modulus of elasticity, Poisson's ratio, and transition strain where the response is bilinear. Strength measured along the 0° direction releases a prepreg lot and qualifies a cured panel; transverse and off-axis strengths are matrix- and interface-dominated, so they expose undercure and poor fibre wet-out that a 0° coupon hides. Chord modulus, taken between 1000 and 3000 microstrain, and Poisson's ratio go straight into laminate theory and finite-element models as ply-level design inputs.

Coupon and tabs

Straight-sided, not waisted — and that is the first thing people get wrong when they arrive from metals or plastics testing.

Geometry
Straight-sided rectangleA reduced section would simply fail at the radius in a fibre-dominated laminate. There is no waist anywhere.
0° unidirectional carbon
About 15 mm × 1 mm
Transverse and balanced laminates
About 25 mm × 2 to 2.5 mm
End tabs
About 1.5 mm thick, 25 or 56 mm longBonded, to protect the gripped ends from the wedge serrations.
Cut edges
Machined square and cleanEdge damage seeds early failure, and on a composite that failure is indistinguishable from a low-strength laminate.
Conditioning
23 °C and 50 % RHMoisture conditioning to ASTM D5229/D5229M where the test plan calls for it.
Discard and replace
Any failure at or inside the tabThat is a grip-induced failure and does not describe the laminate.
Record the failure mode
Every couponDakThe three-letter failure code is not paperwork — it is how you tell a valid gauge-section break from a tab failure that happened to give a plausible number.

Test speed

Typical rate
About 2 mm/minChosen to bring the coupon to failure in roughly one to ten minutes.
Control mode
Constant head displacement
Hold alignment above all
Not a speed settingDakComposites are far less tolerant of bending than metals. A misaligned load train produces a low strength with no other symptom.

Calculations

Ultimate tensile strengthFtu

Ftu = P_max / A

P_max
maximum force, N
A
average cross-sectional area, mm²
Chord modulusE_chord

E = Δσ / Δε between 1000 and 3000 microstrain

Δσ
change in stress across the interval, MPa
Δε
corresponding change in strain, mm/mm

A microstrain is 10⁻⁶ strain, so the interval runs from 0.1 % to 0.3 %. It is a FIXED strain interval, not the steepest part of the curve. Where the response is bilinear the transition strain is reported separately rather than averaged into one modulus.

Poisson's ratioν

ν = −ε_transverse / ε_longitudinal

Needs a transverse strain measurement as well as a longitudinal one — a biaxial extensometer or a second gauge.

How the test runs

  1. 01Cut straight-sided coupons from the cured panel, machining the edges square and clean.
  2. 02Bond end tabs where the lay-up and grip require them.
  3. 03Measure width and thickness at several stations and average.
  4. 04Condition to the standard atmosphere, or to D5229 where moisture conditioning applies.
  5. 05Set the grips and check alignment carefully — this matters more here than in metals work.
  6. 06Fit an extensometer, biaxial where Poisson's ratio is required.
  7. 07Run at constant head displacement, targeting failure in one to ten minutes.
  8. 08Record force, displacement and strain continuously to failure.
  9. 09Note the failure mode and location using the standard's code.
  10. 10Reject any coupon that failed at or inside the tab.
  11. 11Take chord modulus between 1000 and 3000 microstrain, not from the steepest region.

Watch the test

A tension test on our own frame with non-contact strain measurement. The coupon is not a composite, but the alignment demands and the strain measurement are what this method rests on.

Grips and fixtures for this method

Square-bodied hydraulic wedge grips
TJ-144

Heavy Duty Hydraulic Grips

Hydraulic wedges apply a controlled, even clamping pressure across a tabbed end — enough to hold a high-strength laminate without the point loading that starts a tab failure.

Specifications
Universal parallel wedge grips holding a flat specimen between self-tightening jaws
Self-tighteningTJ-15

Universal Parallel Wedge Grips

Parallel wedges with interchangeable faces for thinner coupons and lower-strength lay-ups, where hydraulic closure is more than the specimen needs.

Specifications

What the report has to contain

  • Reference to ASTM D3039 and the edition
  • Material, lay-up, ply orientation and cure schedule
  • Panel identification and coupon location within it
  • Coupon dimensions, tab material, thickness and length
  • Conditioning, including moisture conditioning where used
  • Test speed and control mode
  • Ultimate tensile strength and strain
  • Chord modulus, with the strain interval stated
  • Poisson's ratio where determined
  • Transition strain where the response was bilinear
  • FAILURE MODE AND LOCATION for every coupon, using the standard's code
  • Number of valid coupons and any rejected

What the machine must be capable of

Force demand swings by more than an order of magnitude with lay-up, so the frame is sized to the laminate, not to the method. A 90° transverse coupon fails at around 2 to 3 kN; a 0° unidirectional carbon coupon at roughly 30 to 40 kN; a thick balanced-symmetric carbon laminate well past 60 kN. Frames offered for this work run from about 50 kN for glass-reinforced laminates to 250 kN for carbon, with 100 kN the common all-round choice. Force indication must be verified to ASTM E4.

The rate is 2 mm/min (0.05 in/min) of constant head displacement, or a constant strain rate of 0.01 min⁻¹, chosen so the coupon fails in roughly 1 to 10 minutes — polymer matrices are rate-sensitive, so the rate used belongs in the report.

Strain measurement needs an extensometer classified to ASTM E83 Class B-1 over a 10 to 50 mm gauge length. Total range beyond about 5 % is wasted, since carbon laminates fail below 2 % and glass between 3 and 5 %; resolution at 1000 to 3000 microstrain is what actually governs the choice, because chord modulus is taken across that window.

Grips are body-over-wedge, mechanical or hydraulic, so holding force rises with load. Side-loading hydraulic wedges clamp perpendicular to the coupon rather than dragging it during closure, and grip force must be adjustable: too little slips, too much crushes the laminate. Faces are surface-grit for untabbed coupons, serrated or diamond-coated for tabbed ones. Load-train alignment is a requirement in its own right. Non-ambient testing brings an environmental chamber and all-temperature grips into scope.

What goes wrong in practice

Tab debond ends the test before the gauge section does: the adhesive bond line releases in shear and the coupon records a low strength that must be discarded, not averaged. Grip-induced failure is the same loss from the other side — clamping too hard crushes the laminate at the tab end. Off-axis loading from a misaligned load train bends the coupon, scattering strength and reading modulus low. Longitudinal splitting and delamination in unidirectional coupons produce a ragged curve and an ambiguous failure load.

How it differs from the standards nearest to it

ASTM D3039ASTM D638ISO 527-4/-5
SubjectPolymer matrix compositesRigid plasticsComposites
CouponStraight-sided with tabsWaisted dumbbellStraight-sided with tabs
ModulusChord, 1000–3000 microstrainInitial tangentFixed-interval chord
Failure mode recordingCoded, and requiredLocation notedRecorded
TabsUsually requiredNoneUsually required

Testing a composite to D638 is the classic mistake. The dumbbell radius becomes the failure site in a fibre-dominated laminate, so the number describes the geometry of the cut rather than the material.

Questions we are asked about this test

What is ASTM D3039?

It is the ASTM test method for the in-plane tensile properties of polymer matrix composites. A straight-sided coupon from a cured laminate is pulled to failure, and the method reports ultimate tensile strength and strain, chord modulus and Poisson's ratio.

Why is the coupon straight-sided instead of a dumbbell?

Because in a fibre-dominated laminate, a reduced section fails at the radius rather than in the gauge. Cutting a waist severs load-bearing fibres and creates the exact stress concentration the geometry was meant to avoid, so the result describes the cut rather than the material. Straight sides with bonded end tabs are the answer instead.

What are end tabs for and do I always need them?

They protect the gripped ends from wedge serrations, spreading the clamping load so the coupon does not fail in the grip. They are usually required, particularly for high-strength unidirectional lay-ups. Whether they are needed depends on the material, the lay-up and the grip — and the test that keeps failing at the tab is telling you the tabbing needs attention.

How is modulus defined in ASTM D3039?

As a chord between 1000 and 3000 microstrain — a fixed interval of 0.1 % to 0.3 % strain — rather than the steepest part of the curve. Where the response is bilinear, the transition strain is reported separately instead of being averaged into a single modulus that describes neither region.

Why does my coupon keep failing at the tab?

Usually clamping pressure or tab bonding. Too much grip pressure crushes the tabbed end; a poorly bonded tab lets the load transfer abruptly at its edge. Misalignment adds bending on top. A failure at or inside the tab is invalid under the method and must be replaced, not averaged in — which is why the failure mode is coded and recorded on every coupon.

Can I test composites to ASTM D638 instead?

No, and it is the most common mistake made with composite coupons. D638's dumbbell geometry works because rigid plastics are isotropic and the waist genuinely concentrates stress in the gauge. In a laminate the waist cuts fibres, and the coupon fails at the radius at a load that has nothing to do with the laminate's strength.

Why is alignment more critical for composites?

Because composites are far less tolerant of bending than metals. A metal coupon yields locally and redistributes a small misalignment; a fibre-dominated laminate does not, so the bending stress simply adds to the tensile stress on one face. The result is a low strength with no other symptom on the curve.

Running ASTM D3039 on the Series 7200 and Series 9000

Dak verifies against whichever standard the method names, and where a class applies our frames sit a class tighter than it asks.

The method asks forDak supplies
CapacityForce demand swings by more than an order of magnitude with lay-up: a 90° transverse coupon of 25 × 2 mm fails around 2-3 kN, a 0° unidirectional carbon coupon of 15 × 1 mm at roughly 30-40 kN, and a thick balanced-symmetric carbon laminate of 25 × 2,5 mm well past 60 kN. Frames offered for this method run from about 50 kN for glass-reinforced work to 250 kN for carbon composites, with 100 kN the common all-round choice.Load cells from 1 kg to 60 ton on the Series 7200, and 0.5 to 100 kN on the Series 9000
Force accuracyASTM E4Verified to ASTM E4, and to ISO 7500-1 Class 0.5
Strain measurementAn extensometer to ASTM E83 Class B-1, gauge length extensometer gauge length 10 to 50; free length between tabs unknown (not published — 138 and 125 are arithmetic derivations from overall and tab lengths, not quoted values)Certified to ASTM E83 and ISO 9513 Class 1 non-contact video, clip-on and high-elongation
GrippingPrecision-aligned hydraulic or mechanical wedge grips on straight-sided tabbed coupons, with clip-on, sensor-arm or video extensometryOur self-tightening serrated wedge grips, with V-jaws for round specimens, built to the specimen
EnvironmentStandard laboratory atmosphere 23 °C ±3 °C and 50 % ±10 % RH; the method also contemplates non-ambient testing, which brings an environmental chamber and all-temperature grips into the specification3009 series chambers, −150 °C to +400 °C — temperature only

For material selection, measurement and system configuration, explore DAK composite testing systems.

This page describes the method as practised. The governing text is the current edition from the issuing body. Tell us what you are testing and we will answer with the machine, the fixture and a quotation.

Materials tested to it

The test it standardises

Industries that test to it

Other standards explained