Testing standard

ASTM D5766

Standard Test Method for Open-Hole Tensile Strength of Polymer Matrix Composite Laminates

Written and technically reviewed by Dak System Inc. engineeringLast reviewed

ASTM D5766 measures the open-hole tensile strength of a composite laminate. A coupon with a precisely machined central hole is pulled to failure, and the strength is calculated on the gross cross-section — as though the hole were not there. It is the standard notched allowable used to size composite structures around fastener holes and cut-outs.

At a glance

Test type
Tensilethe specimen is pulled apart
Published by
ASTM
Edition
D5766/D5766M-23

What the test does

A flat coupon is cut from a balanced, symmetric laminate and a hole is machined precisely at its centre, with the coupon width set at six times the hole diameter — commonly 36 mm wide with a 6 mm hole. The coupon is gripped in long-faced wedge grips and pulled at about 2 mm/min until it fails. The failure is expected to run through the hole, across the reduced net section. The maximum force is recorded, and the open-hole tensile strength is calculated by dividing it by the gross cross-sectional area — width times thickness, with no allowance made for the material the hole removed.

What it measures, and why it matters

The result is a notched tensile allowable, and it is the number composite structures are actually designed on. Composites are notch-sensitive: a hole reduces strength by considerably more than the material it removes, because the fibres that would have carried the load cannot redistribute it the way a ductile metal can. Since real structures are full of fastener holes, access panels and cut-outs, the unnotched strength describes a laminate nobody builds with. Expressing the result on gross area folds the hole's effect into the allowable itself, so a designer can compare laminates and apply the figure directly.

Specimen and hole

The hole is the specimen. Its diameter, its position and above all the quality of its machined surface decide the answer.

Width-to-diameter ratio
6 : 1Fixed so that results from different coupon sizes are comparable. Changing it changes the stress field around the hole.
Common geometry
36 mm wide × 152 mm long, with a 6 mm hole
Hole position
Centred, on the coupon axisAn off-centre hole produces an asymmetric net section and fails early on the narrow side.
Hole machining
Drilled and reamed, or a specialist composite drillThe dominant variable. Delamination, fibre pull-out or heat damage at the hole wall lowers the strength substantially.
Lay-up
Balanced and symmetric
Back the laminate when drilling
With a sacrificial boardDakBreakout at the exit face is the commonest hole defect and it is almost entirely preventable.
Inspect every hole before testing
Under magnificationDakA hole with visible delamination has already decided the result, and testing it wastes an expensive coupon.

The strength is calculated on the GROSS cross-section, ignoring the hole. It is deliberately not a net-section stress. Recalculating on the net area produces a different and non-comparable number that no design allowable is expressed in.

Test speed

Crosshead speed
2 mm/min nominal
End of test
Maximum force at failure
Valid failure
Through the hole, across the net sectionFailures at the grips are rejected.
Photograph the failed coupon
Before handling it furtherDakFailure path through the hole is evidence the result is real, and a broken composite coupon does not survive much handling.

Calculations

Open-hole tensile strengthσᴼᴴᵀ

σᴼᴴᵀ = Pmax / (w × h)

Pmax
maximum force, N
w
coupon width, mm
h
coupon thickness, mm

Gross area — width times thickness, with no allowance for the hole. This is a convention, and it is what makes open-hole strengths comparable between laboratories and usable as design allowables.

How the test runs

  1. 01Cut coupons from a balanced, symmetric laminate to the specified width.
  2. 02Back the laminate with a sacrificial board and drill the central hole.
  3. 03Ream or finish the hole to the required diameter and surface quality.
  4. 04Inspect each hole under magnification and reject damaged ones.
  5. 05Measure the coupon width and thickness away from the hole.
  6. 06Check the hole is centred on the coupon axis.
  7. 07Condition to the specification.
  8. 08Fit long-faced wedge grips and align the coupon carefully.
  9. 09Pull at 2 mm/min to failure.
  10. 10Record the maximum force.
  11. 11Confirm the failure ran through the hole across the net section.
  12. 12Calculate strength on the gross cross-section.

Grips and fixtures for this method

Square-bodied hydraulic wedge grips
TJ-144

Heavy Duty Hydraulic Grips

Heavy duty hydraulic wedge grips. A wide open-hole coupon at high load needs long grip faces and a constant clamping force that does not fall away as the coupon thins slightly under load.

Specifications
Universal parallel wedge grips holding a flat specimen between self-tightening jaws
Self-tighteningTJ-15

Universal Parallel Wedge Grips

Universal parallel wedge grips, where the coupon width and failure load sit within their range and a mechanical grip is preferred.

Specifications

What the report has to contain

  • Reference to ASTM D5766 and the edition
  • Material, lay-up, ply orientation and cure schedule
  • Coupon width, thickness and hole diameter
  • Width-to-diameter ratio
  • How the hole was machined and inspected
  • Conditioning and test temperature
  • Crosshead speed
  • Maximum force and open-hole tensile strength on gross area for each coupon
  • Failure location and path
  • Coupons rejected, with the reason
  • Mean, standard deviation and coefficient of variation

What the machine must be capable of

Force measurement to ASTM E4 at loads that reach several tens of kilonewtons on a wide coupon, and a crosshead holding about 2 mm/min. The grips do the demanding work: the coupon is wide, the loads are high, and grip face length matters more than raw clamping pressure. Hydraulic wedge grips hold a constant clamping force as the coupon thins slightly under load, which mechanical wedges do not always manage at these loads. Alignment must be good enough that the coupon is loaded purely along its axis, since any eccentricity puts bending across a section already carrying a stress concentration.

What goes wrong in practice

Hole quality accounts for most unexplained low results, and it is usually invisible without magnification — a ring of delamination at the exit face lowers the strength before any load is applied. Grip failures are the next most common problem and must be rejected rather than reported. The most consequential error is not in the laboratory at all: recalculating the strength on net area, or comparing an open-hole figure with an unnotched D3039 result. Both produce numbers that look reasonable and are not comparable with any published allowable. Finally, an off-centre hole gives a quiet, consistent underestimate that is easy to miss.

ASTM D5766 or ASTM D3039

ASTM D5766ASTM D3039
CouponCentral holePlain, unnotched
Strength basisGross area, ignoring the holeCross-sectional area
What it representsNotched allowable for holes and cut-outsUnnotched laminate strength
Design useSizing around fasteners and openingsBasic material characterisation

These are not alternatives. A composite structure is almost always designed on the notched allowable, because it has holes in it. Using an unnotched D3039 strength where a hole exists overstates the laminate substantially.

Questions we are asked about this test

What is ASTM D5766?

It is the ASTM method for the open-hole tensile strength of composite laminates. A coupon with a precisely machined central hole is pulled to failure, and the strength is calculated on the gross cross-section as though the hole were not there. It provides the notched tensile allowable used to size composite structures around fastener holes and cut-outs.

Why is the strength based on gross area rather than net area?

Because it is a design convention that makes the numbers usable. Calculating on gross area folds the effect of the hole into the strength figure itself, so a designer can compare laminates directly and apply the allowable without recomputing stress concentrations. A net-section value would be a different quantity, and no published open-hole allowable is expressed that way — mixing the two is a straightforward route to an unconservative design.

Why is the width-to-diameter ratio fixed at 6:1?

Because the stress field around a hole depends on how much material surrounds it. A hole in a narrow coupon interacts with the free edges; the same hole in a very wide coupon behaves as though it were in an infinite plate. Fixing the ratio at 6:1 keeps that interaction constant, so results from different coupon and hole sizes remain comparable.

How much does hole machining affect the result?

More than any other variable in the test. Composites delaminate readily at a drilled hole, particularly at the exit face, and fibres can be pulled rather than cut. A hole with delamination or heat damage at its wall has already lowered the strength before any load is applied. Backing the laminate with a sacrificial board, using a drill intended for composites, and inspecting every hole under magnification are the practical controls.

Can I use an unnotched strength if my part has holes?

No, and doing so is one of the more dangerous shortcuts in composite design. Composites are notch-sensitive, and the drop from unnotched to open-hole strength is large. Since virtually every real composite structure has fastener holes, access panels or cut-outs, notched allowables are what structures are actually sized on. An unnotched figure describes a laminate no aircraft or vehicle is made from.

What is a valid failure?

One that runs through the hole, across the net section, away from the grips. A coupon failing at or inside the grips has measured the gripping rather than the laminate and is rejected. Because the evidence sits in the fracture path, photographing the failed coupon before handling it further is worth the minute it takes — a broken composite coupon does not survive much handling.

Is there a compression equivalent?

Yes, ASTM D6484 covers open-hole compression using its own fixture, and the two are normally generated as a pair. Compression is usually the more critical case for a composite, so a notched compressive allowable matters at least as much as the tensile one. ASTM D5961 covers the related bearing case, where the load is carried by a fastener in the hole rather than by the laminate around an empty one.

Running ASTM D5766 on the Series 7200 and Series 9000

Dak verifies against whichever standard the method names, and where a class applies our frames sit a class tighter than it asks.

The method asks forDak supplies
CapacityHigh — a 36 mm wide carbon laminate coupon commonly fails between 20 and 60 kNLoad cells from 1 kg to 60 ton on the Series 7200, and 0.5 to 100 kN on the Series 9000
Force accuracyASTM E4Verified to ASTM E4, and to ISO 7500-1 Class 0.5
GrippingWedge grips, mechanical or hydraulic, with faces long enough to hold a wide coupon without slippingOur self-tightening serrated wedge grips, with V-jaws for round specimens, built to the specimen
EnvironmentStandard laboratory atmosphere, or conditioned and elevated-temperature where the specification requires3009 series chambers, −150 °C to +400 °C — temperature only

This page describes the method as practised. The governing text is the current edition from the issuing body. Tell us what you are testing and we will answer with the machine, the fixture and a quotation.

Materials tested to it

The test it standardises

Other standards explained