Testing standard

ASTM F88

Standard Test Method for Seal Strength of Flexible Barrier Materials

Written and technically reviewed by Dak System Inc. engineeringLast reviewed

ASTM F88 measures the seal strength of a flexible barrier material — the force needed to pull a defined width of seal apart. A strip cut through the seal is clamped by its two tails and separated at a constant rate. It reports maximum force, average force, or the whole curve, together with the failure mode, which is the diagnostic half of the result.

At a glance

Test type
Peel & adhesiona bonded joint is pulled apart
Published by
ASTM
Edition
F88/F88M-23

What the test does

A strip is cut across a sealed area of a package so the seal runs through its middle. The two unsealed tails are clamped in opposing grips with the seal roughly midway between them, and the crosshead separates the grips at a constant rate until the seal pulls fully apart. Force against grip separation is recorded throughout, so the whole peel trace is captured, not just the peak.

What it measures, and why it matters

The method reports seal strength — the force needed to pull a defined width of seal apart — as maximum, average or the whole force curve, together with the failure mode observed. Maximum force is what medical device and pharmaceutical manufacturers use for lot release and for validating a sealing process window against a specification. Average force describes how a peelable seal opens in a clinician's hands, which is a usability question rather than a strength one. Failure mode is the diagnostic half of the result: the same peak force means something different if the film tore instead of the seal peeling.

Strip and sampling

Width
15 mm (1 in.)
Length
75 mm plus the seal widthSo both tails reach their grips.
Orientation
Cut across the seal, seal at the middle
Sampling
From the user's planSterile barrier work commonly takes specimens from every seal of a pouch and several positions along a long one, because seal strength varies with position under the jaws.
Cuts
Clean and parallelA nicked or tapered edge starts a tear and the result is discarded.
Conditioning
23 °C and 50 % RH, typically 24 hASTM E171, the flexible-barrier standard atmosphere, testing in the same.

Test speed and tail support

Rate
Constant, commonly 200 to 300 mm/minRead the rate from the edition and the specification in force.
Technique A
Unsupported tailsThe tails hang free. The commonest and the least constrained.
Technique B
Supported at 90°
Technique C
Supported at 180°
The technique changes the number
MateriallySupport changes the peel angle at the seal, so a specification that names a seal strength must also name the technique.

Calculations

Seal strengthS

S = F / w

F
maximum or average force, N
w
specimen width, mm — nominally 15 mm

Maximum force is the lot-release figure. Average force describes how a peelable seal opens in a clinician's hands, which is a usability question rather than a strength one — the two answer different questions and both may be required.

How the test runs

  1. 01Take specimens according to the sampling plan, from each seal and several positions along long seals.
  2. 02Cut 15 mm strips across the seal, cleanly and parallel, seal roughly midway.
  3. 03Condition to ASTM E171 and test in that atmosphere.
  4. 04Choose the technique — A, B or C — from the specification, and record it.
  5. 05Clamp the two tails in opposing grips.
  6. 06Separate at the constant specified rate, recording force against separation.
  7. 07Continue until the seal pulls fully apart.
  8. 08Record maximum force, average force, or the whole curve as required.
  9. 09Classify the failure mode — adhesive peel, cohesive, delamination, or material tear.
  10. 10Discard anything that tore from a cut edge rather than failing at the seal.

The same peak force means something quite different if the film tore instead of the seal peeling. A tear can read higher than a clean peel while representing a package that will fail unpredictably, which is why the failure mode is not optional.

Grips and fixtures for this method

Pneumatic vice action grips with 25 mm square jaw faces
Standard 25 mm

Pneumatic Vice Action Grip

Constant air pressure across the full jaw face holds a thin film tail without cutting it — a seal test that fails at the grip has measured the grip.

Specifications
Light duty pneumatic grips, upper and lower
HJ-42

Light Duty Pneumatic Grip

Light duty closure for the lowest seal strengths, where a heavier grip would damage the web before the seal is loaded.

Specifications

What the report has to contain

  • Reference to ASTM F88 and the TECHNIQUE used — A, B or C
  • Material identification, both webs, and the sealing process parameters
  • Sampling plan and where on the package each specimen came from
  • Specimen width as measured
  • Conditioning and test atmosphere
  • Rate of grip separation
  • Maximum force, average force, or the curve, as specified
  • FAILURE MODE for every specimen
  • Number of specimens, mean and standard deviation

What the machine must be capable of

Seal forces are light. Medical device seals commonly peak between about 4 and 9 N per 15 mm strip, pharmaceutical seals a little higher, and tough laminates or tray lidding run to a few tens of newtons, so a 50 N to 500 N load cell on a single-column frame is the normal fit rather than a general-purpose high-capacity frame. Force resolution at the bottom of the range matters more than headroom: a peel trace read on a 5 kN cell resolves nothing useful. The method does not itself set an accuracy class, so the applicable force-verification requirement comes from the laboratory's quality system.

Grip separation runs at 200 to 300 mm/min (8 to 12 in./min). Travel demand is short — full separation normally occurs within 50 mm of crosshead movement — but the initial grip separation is a required reporting item, so it has to be set and logged rather than assumed. No extensometer is involved; peel is a force-against-displacement measurement, not a strain one.

Fixturing is what the three techniques differ on. Technique A leaves the seal unsupported between the grips; Technique B supports it perpendicular to the tails at 90°; Technique C folds the more flexible tail 180° back over the seal with the stiffer member held flat, and the 2023 edition adds two Technique C approaches for flexible-to-rigid and semi-rigid trays using alignment plates. Opposing side-action grips, commonly pneumatic, hold the tails at constant clamping force. Mixing techniques within a series destroys comparability.

What goes wrong in practice

Bending force is the standard bias: in Technique A the tails flex as they load, and that parasitic bending adds to the reading, so unsupported results sit above supported ones on the same seal. Film tear instead of seal peel gives a high number that describes the substrate, not the seal. Delamination — laminate layers separating internally — reads as a low, ragged trace and is often logged as a weak seal when the seal never failed. Slipping tails give a false early peak.

What F88 does and does not tell you

ASTM F88 seal strengthSeal integrity tests
Question answeredHow strong is the seal?Is there a leak path?
DestructiveYesSome are, some are not
Detects a channel leakNot reliablyYes — that is the point
Used forProcess validation and lot releasePackage integrity assurance

A strong seal and an intact seal are different claims. F88 can pass a package that carries a narrow channel leak, because the surrounding seal still carries the load — which is why sterile barrier programmes run integrity testing alongside it rather than instead of it.

Questions we are asked about this test

What is ASTM F88?

It is the ASTM test for seal strength of flexible barrier materials. A strip cut across a seal is clamped by its two tails and pulled apart at a constant rate, and the method reports the force needed to separate a defined width of seal, together with the failure mode.

What is the difference between Technique A, B and C?

How the tails are supported. Technique A leaves them unsupported, B supports them at 90° and C at 180°. Support changes the peel angle at the seal and therefore the force, so the three are not interchangeable — a specification quoting a seal strength has to name the technique it was measured under.

Should I report maximum or average force?

It depends on the question. Maximum force is what medical device and pharmaceutical manufacturers use for lot release and for validating a sealing process window. Average force describes how a peelable seal opens in a clinician's hands, which is usability rather than strength. Many specifications call for both.

Why does the failure mode matter so much here?

Because the same peak force can mean opposite things. A seal that peels cleanly and a film that tears can record similar numbers, but a tearing web indicates a package that will fail unpredictably in handling. Recording only the force throws away the part of the result that tells you whether the package is sound.

Does a strong seal mean an intact seal?

No, and this is the most consequential misunderstanding about the test. F88 can pass a package carrying a narrow channel leak, because the surrounding seal still takes the load. Seal strength and seal integrity are different claims, which is why sterile barrier programmes run integrity testing alongside F88 rather than treating one as evidence of the other.

Why sample from several positions along a seal?

Because seal strength varies with position under the sealing jaws — temperature, pressure and dwell are never perfectly uniform across a long seal or around a pouch. A single specimen from a convenient spot characterises that spot. Sampling from each seal and along its length is what turns the test into process validation.

Running ASTM F88 on the Series 7200 and Series 9000

Dak verifies against whichever standard the method names, and where a class applies our frames sit a class tighter than it asks.

The method asks forDak supplies
CapacityVery light forces — medical device seals commonly peak around 4 to 9 N per 15 mm strip and pharmaceutical seals a little higher, with tough laminates and tray lidding running to a few tens of newtons, so a 50 N to 500 N load cell on a single-column frame is the normal fit.Load cells from 1 kg to 60 ton on the Series 7200, and 0.5 to 100 kN on the Series 9000
Force accuracyunknownISO 7500-1 Class 0.5 — the method sets no class of its own
GrippingOpposing side-action grips with the seal centred, plus a 90° or 180° seal support (alignment plates) for Techniques B and COur vice-action grips, built to the specimen
EnvironmentCondition per ASTM E171 and test at ambient — seal strength is defined as the tensile strength of the seal at ambient temperature3009 series chambers, −150 °C to +400 °C — temperature only

This page describes the method as practised. The governing text is the current edition from the issuing body. Tell us what you are testing and we will answer with the machine, the fixture and a quotation.

The test it standardises

Industries that test to it

Other standards explained