Testing standard
ASTM C633
Standard Test Method for Adhesion or Cohesion Strength of Thermal Spray Coatings
Written and technically reviewed by Dak System Inc. engineeringLast reviewed
ASTM C633 pulls a thermal spray coating off its substrate in tension normal to the surface. A coated cylinder is glued face to face with an uncoated one and the assembly is pulled apart; the failure load divided by the coated area is the result. Whether that number is adhesion or cohesion is decided by where the break ran, so the failure mode is half the answer.
At a glance
- Test type
- Peel & adhesion — a bonded joint is pulled apart
- Published by
- ASTM
- Edition
- C633-24
- Material
- Adhesives, tapes & bonded joints
- Runs on
- Series 7200 and Series 9000
What the test does
A coating is thermally sprayed onto the flat end face of a cylindrical substrate fixture. That coated face is then bonded with an adhesive to the matching face of a second, uncoated loading fixture, and the completed assembly — substrate, coating, adhesive, loading fixture — is pulled apart in tension normal to the plane of the coating. The force at separation, divided by the coated area, is the reported strength. The coating is loaded in the one direction it is rarely loaded in service, straight off its substrate, because that is the direction in which a sprayed deposit is weakest and the only one in which a single number describes the bond.
What it measures, and why it matters
Adhesion or cohesion, and which of the two you have measured is decided by where the assembly separated, not by the operator. If the break runs along the coating-to-substrate interface, the figure is adhesion: how well the deposit is keyed to the prepared surface. If it runs within the deposit itself, the figure is cohesion: how well the sprayed particles have bonded to one another. Both are useful, and they point at different corrections — a low adhesion figure sends you back to grit blasting, preheat and stand-off, while a low cohesion figure sends you back to particle temperature and velocity. Because the number is a routine condition of approval for a coating and for the shop applying it, the failure mode is not a footnote to the result; it is half of it.
The coated assembly
Two cylinders, one coated on its end face, bonded together and pulled apart along their common axis.
- Substrate fixture
- Cylinder, coated on one flat end face
- Loading fixture
- Matching uncoated cylinder, bonded to the coated face
- Diameter
- Of the order of 25 mmPracticeVendor fixtures and laboratory descriptions put the standard specimen at about 25 mm; the exact figure is in the purchased text of the method.
- Minimum coating thickness
- Greater than 0.38 mm (0.015 in.)Below this the bonding adhesive wicks through the coating porosity to the substrate, and the test then measures the glue.
- Coating processes covered
- Combustion flame, plasma arc, two-wire arc, high-velocity oxygen fuel, detonation
- Coating and substrate materials
- Ceramic and metal coatings on metal or ceramic substrates
- Test temperature
- Normally ambientPracticeThe method does not fix a test temperature; it notes that very low temperatures may suit fundamental investigation.
- Bonding agent
- A high-strength adhesive, chosen to out-perform the coatingPracticeIt is a ceiling on the whole method. If the glue lets go first, you have a lower bound, not a result.
- Bonding-agent control
- A set of uncoated fixtures bonded alongside the coated onesBonded at essentially the same time, so the adhesive's own strength is measured on the same batch and the ceiling is a known number rather than an assumption.
The bonded area is measured, not assumed. Every reported strength is a load divided by that area, so an over-run of adhesive beyond the coated face quietly inflates the denominator.
Rate of loading
- Rate
- Constant crosshead travel between 0.013 and 0.021 mm/s (0.030 to 0.050 in./min)Applied as an increasing tensile load until rupture. The assembly is drawn steadily apart rather than snapped.
- Machine requirement
- To Practices E4, with permissible variation under 1 %
- Load path
- Self-aligning devices that permit no eccentric load or bending momentThis is a clause of the method, not a refinement of it.
- Recorded quantity
- Maximum load applied before ruptureThere is no curve to interpret — the assembly holds until it does not.
Calculations
σ = F_max / A
- F_max
- force at separation, N
- A
- coated (bonded) area, mm²
The same arithmetic gives adhesion or cohesion. Which one you have is read off the fracture surface, not out of the equation.
How the test runs
- 01Prepare the substrate fixture face — clean and roughen as the coating process requires.
- 02Apply the thermal spray coating to that face, thicker than the method's minimum.
- 03Prepare and clean the mating face of the uncoated loading fixture.
- 04Bond the two together with the chosen adhesive and cure it to its schedule, holding the fixtures parallel and aligned throughout.
- 05Bond a set of uncoated fixtures at the same time, to measure the bonding agent's own strength.
- 06Measure the bonded area.
- 07Mount the assembly through self-aligning couplings at both ends.
- 08Pull in tension normal to the coating plane, at 0.013 to 0.021 mm/s of crosshead travel, to rupture.
- 09Record the maximum load applied.
- 10Examine both faces and classify the failure — at the coating-to-substrate interface, within the coating, in the bonding agent, or a combination; on a multilayer coating, note any internal adhesive failure between layers.
- 11Divide peak force by the measured area, and report the failure mode with the number.
A specimen that fails in the bonding agent has not measured the coating. Report it as a lower bound and repeat with a stronger adhesive.
What the report has to contain
- Reference to ASTM C633 and the edition
- Coating material or designation, the spray technique and the equipment used
- Spray parameters
- Final coating thickness, and whether the surface is finished or as-sprayed
- Substrate material
- Description of the surface preparation of the substrate
- Bonding agent, and the bonding procedure where it departs from the maker's instructions
- Number of specimens sprayed and number tested
- Adhesion or cohesion strength of each specimen
- Average, maximum and minimum strength
- DESCRIPTION OF THE FAILURE — at the coating-to-substrate interface, in the coating, in the bonding agent, or a combination, plus any internal adhesive failure on a multilayer coating
What the machine must be capable of
Modest capacity, excellent alignment. On a 25 mm face the bonded area is around 500 mm², so a well-bonded coating carrying tens of megapascals fails somewhere in the tens of kilonewtons, and a frame in the 50 kN class covers the work with headroom. Poorly bonded or deliberately weak coatings fail at a small fraction of that, so force resolution at the bottom of the range matters as much as capacity.
Alignment is not a refinement here, it is a clause: the apparatus must apply the load through self-aligning devices that do not permit an eccentric load or a bending moment on the specimen. The assembly is short, stiff and brittle, and any eccentricity in the load path puts bending across the coating plane, which peels one edge first and depresses the result. Self-aligning couplings at both ends, rather than fixed threaded adapters, are what keep the pull axial. The frame is verified to Practices E4, and the load is applied at a constant rate of crosshead travel between 0.013 and 0.021 mm/s (0.030 to 0.050 in./min) until rupture — the assembly is drawn steadily apart, not snapped.
What goes wrong in practice
Failure of the bonding adhesive instead of the coating, which yields a lower bound rather than a result and must be reported as such. Adhesive penetration through a coating applied below the thickness limit. Misalignment, which reads as an unexplained spread between nominally identical specimens. Contamination of the coated face before bonding. And reporting a mean strength with no statement of where each specimen broke, which leaves the number uninterpretable.
Pulling normal to a bonded plane — four methods
| ASTM C633 | ASTM D4541 | ASTM C297 | ASTM D897 / D2095 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| What is bonded | Thermal spray coating | Paint or coating film | Sandwich core to facing | Adhesive between adherends |
| Where it is run | Laboratory frame | Field, portable tester | Laboratory frame | Laboratory frame |
| Loading | Tension normal to the surface | Tension normal to the surface | Flatwise tension | Butt tension |
| Limited by | The bonding adhesive | The dolly adhesive | The bond to the facing | Alignment of the joint |
All four are limited by whatever glue holds the fixture on. In every case a failure in that glue is a lower bound on the property, not a measurement of it.
Questions we are asked about this test
What is ASTM C633?
It is the ASTM test method for the adhesion or cohesion strength of thermal spray coatings. A coating is sprayed onto the end face of a cylindrical fixture, that face is bonded to a matching uncoated fixture, and the assembly is pulled apart in tension normal to the coating. The failure load divided by the coated area is the reported strength.
Does C633 measure adhesion or cohesion?
Whichever the specimen chose. If the separation runs along the coating-to-substrate interface the figure is adhesion; if it runs inside the deposit it is cohesion. The arithmetic is identical, so the fracture surface has to be examined and the mode reported, or the number cannot be interpreted at all.
Why is there a minimum coating thickness?
Because the coating has to be thick enough to stop the bonding adhesive reaching the substrate. Thermal spray deposits are porous; on a thin coating the glue penetrates through to the metal underneath and the test measures the adhesive rather than the coating. The method is limited to coatings that can be applied thicker than 0.38 mm (0.015 in.) for exactly that reason.
What happens if the glue fails first?
You have a lower bound, not a result. The bonding agent is a ceiling on the whole method: no strength above the glue's own can be measured. The method anticipates this by having a set of uncoated fixtures bonded at the same time, so the adhesive's own strength is a measured number rather than an assumption. Report the specimen as a bonding-agent failure and repeat with an adhesive that out-performs the coating.
Why does alignment matter so much?
Because the assembly is short, stiff and brittle, and it has no compliance to absorb an off-axis pull. Any eccentricity turns part of the tension into bending, which lifts one edge of the coating plane into peel and separates it early. The method requires self-aligning devices that permit no eccentric load or bending moment, so this is a clause rather than good practice: self-aligning couplings at both ends let the specimen find the load line instead of being forced onto it.
Which coating processes does C633 cover?
Coatings deposited by combustion flame, plasma arc, two-wire arc, high-velocity oxygen fuel and detonation, applied as ceramic or metal coatings on metal or ceramic substrates. The test is normally run at ambient temperature.
Can a C633 result be used as a design stress?
No. It is a process and qualification measurement — it tells you whether a spray process, a surface preparation or a coating supplier is producing what it produced last time. Service loading on a coating is rarely pure tension normal to the surface, and the figure does not transfer to a different geometry or loading direction.
What frame size does the test need?
A modest one. On a face of about 25 mm diameter the bonded area is around 500 mm², so even a strongly bonded coating fails in the tens of kilonewtons and a 50 kN frame has ample headroom. Resolution at the low end matters more than capacity, because weak or deliberately sacrificial coatings fail at a small fraction of that.
Running ASTM C633 on the Series 7200 and Series 9000
Dak verifies against whichever standard the method names, and where a class applies our frames sit a class tighter than it asks.
| The method asks for | Dak supplies | |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | The method holds the fixture facing diameter just under an inch, so the bonded area is roughly 400 to 500 mm² and a coating at tens of megapascals ruptures in the tens of kilonewtons. A 50 kN frame covers the work with headroom. Weak or deliberately sacrificial coatings fail at a small fraction of that, so resolution at the bottom of the range matters as much as capacity. | Load cells from 1 kg to 60 ton on the Series 7200, and 0.5 to 100 kN on the Series 9000 |
| Force accuracy | ASTM E4, with permissible variation less than 1 % | Verified to ASTM E4, and to ISO 7500-1 Class 0.5 |
| Gripping | No conventional grips. Substrate and loading fixtures are circular solid cylinders, each adapted at one end for attachment to the self-aligning loading devices of the machine | Wedge, vice-action, pneumatic and hydraulic grips, built to the specimen |
| Environment | Normally ambient. The method fixes no test temperature and notes that very low (cryogenic) temperature may suit fundamental investigation | 3009 series chambers, −150 °C to +400 °C — temperature only |
This page describes the method as practised. The governing text is the current edition from the issuing body. Tell us what you are testing and we will answer with the machine, the fixture and a quotation.
