Testing standard

ISO 9856

Conveyor belts — Determination of elastic and permanent elongation and calculation of elastic modulus

Written and technically reviewed by Dak System Inc. engineeringLast reviewed

ISO 9856 measures how much a conveyor belt stretches and how much of that stretch it keeps. A full-thickness strip is cycled 200 times between two force levels at 0.1 Hz while elongation is recorded, and the method reports elastic elongation, permanent elongation and elastic modulus. Permanent elongation is the figure that sizes the take-up an installed conveyor needs.

At a glance

Test type
Tensilethe specimen is pulled apart
Published by
ISO
Edition
ISO 9856:2016

What the test does

A 50 mm wide strip cut through the full thickness of a conveyor belt is clamped at both ends, with at least 300 mm of free length between the jaw faces. A clip-on device spans a marked reference length of 100 mm or more on the axis of the strip. The machine then cycles the strip sinusoidally between two force levels — 200 cycles at 0.1 Hz — and records elongation throughout.

What it measures, and why it matters

Three figures come out: elastic elongation, permanent elongation and elastic modulus in newtons per millimetre of belt width. Permanent elongation sizes the take-up, since the tensioning gear on an installed conveyor has to absorb whatever stretch the belt keeps after running in. Elastic elongation and modulus feed belt-tension, sag and starting-and-braking calculations for the drive, and they separate steel-cord carcases from textile ones at specification stage rather than after commissioning.

Test piece

Width
50 mm, full thickness
Free length between clamps
At least 300 mm
Cover thickness
Skimmed back to 0.5 to 1 mmCover rubber carries little of the load but adds thickness scatter, so it is reduced rather than left on.
Age at test
No sooner than five days after manufactureThe carcase is still relaxing before that, so an early test measures the relaxation as much as the belt.
Reference length
100 mm or more, marked on the axisTwo extensometer grids on the centreline of the strip.
Conditioning
ISO 18573, at least 16 h
Discard a run that steps
Rather than one that looks wrongDakClamp creep and a lost extensometer reference both show as a STEP in the elongation record. A plausible-looking curve is not evidence the run was clean.

The cycle

There is no crosshead speed here in the usual sense. The machine holds a force waveform, and that is the binding requirement.

Cycles
200 consecutive
Frequency
0.1 Hz — six cycles per minute
Upper reference force
10 % of nominal tensile strength × width1 kN for a 200 N/mm belt on a 50 mm strip; about 15.8 kN for a 3150 N/mm textile belt.
Lower reference force
2 % of nominal tensile strength × width
Initial force
0.5 % of nominal tensile strength × widthApplied first, to take up slack before the cycling begins.
Force class
ISO 7500-1 Class 3 or betterClass 2 is given as an example of better. From the 2003 text; not confirmed here against the 2016 edition.

The requirement is CONTROL, not capacity. Holding an approximately sinusoidal force waveform at 0.1 Hz for 200 consecutive cycles needs closed-loop force control — a frame that can break the belt cannot necessarily cycle it.

Calculations

Elastic elongationεel

εel = recoverable extension / reference length × 100

reference length
the marked distance on the strip axis, at least 100 mm

The part that comes back. It feeds belt-tension, sag and starting-and-braking calculations for the drive.

Permanent elongationεperm

εperm = retained extension / reference length × 100

The part that does not come back. It sizes the take-up, because the tensioning gear has to absorb whatever stretch the belt keeps after running in.

Elastic modulusE

E = Δ force per mm width / Δ elastic strain

force per mm width
N/mm, as belts are rated

In newtons per millimetre of belt width, not in MPa — the same convention as the strength figure, and for the same reason: thickness is not a useful quantity for a layered composite.

How the test runs

  1. 01Wait at least five days after the belt is manufactured before taking the sample.
  2. 02Cut a full-thickness strip 50 mm wide, long enough for at least 300 mm free between the clamps.
  3. 03Skim the covers back to between 0.5 and 1 mm.
  4. 04Condition to ISO 18573 for at least 16 hours.
  5. 05Mark two extensometer grids on the strip axis at a known reference length of 100 mm or more.
  6. 06Clamp the strip and fit the clip-on device across the marked reference length.
  7. 07Compute the initial, lower and upper forces from the belt's nominal rating and the 50 mm width.
  8. 08Apply the initial force to take up slack.
  9. 09Cycle sinusoidally between the lower and upper forces at 0.1 Hz for 200 cycles, recording elongation throughout.
  10. 10Read elastic and permanent elongation from the record, and compute the modulus.
  11. 11Discard the run if the record shows a step — that is clamp creep or a lost reference, not belt behaviour.

Watch the test

This exact method on our own frame: the strip cycling between the two reference forces while the extensometer follows the marked length.

Grips and fixtures for this method

Twin side acting hydraulic grips holding a wide belt specimen
Heavy dutyTJ-531

Twin Side Acting Hydraulic Grips

Twin side-acting closure holds a 50 mm full-thickness strip through 200 load cycles without creeping — clamp creep here shows as a step in the elongation record and voids the run.

Specifications
Hydraulic vice action grips with renewable facing discs
Renewable facingsTJ-161

Hydraulic Wide Vice Action Grips

Wide vice-action jaws, for the larger gripped area a heavy steel-cord belt strip needs at the upper reference force.

Specifications

What the report has to contain

  • Reference to ISO 9856
  • Belt identification, construction and nominal tensile strength rating
  • Time between manufacture and test
  • Test piece width, free length and remaining cover thickness
  • Reference length used for the elongation measurement
  • Initial, lower and upper reference forces, with the percentages they came from
  • Number of cycles and the frequency
  • Elastic elongation
  • Permanent elongation
  • Elastic modulus in N/mm
  • Any run discarded, and why

What the machine must be capable of

Force demand scales with the belt rating, not with the frame's break capacity. The upper reference force is 10 % of nominal tensile strength multiplied by test-piece width and the lower is 2 %, so a 200 N/mm belt on a 50 mm strip cycles between roughly 200 N and 1 kN, a 3150 N/mm textile belt between about 3.2 kN and 15.8 kN, and a heavy steel-cord belt can carry the upper force toward 30–50 kN. An initial force of 0.5 % of nominal tensile strength times width is applied first to take up slack.

The binding capability is control, not capacity: closed-loop force control holding an approximately sinusoidal waveform at 0.1 Hz — six cycles a minute — for 200 consecutive cycles at those loads. Force indication is required to ISO 7500-1 Class 3 or better, with Class 2 given as an example of better, per the 2003 text and not confirmed here for the 2016 edition.

Strain measurement is set by the method itself rather than by an extensometer class: measuring length of at least 100 mm, accurate to 0.1 mm or better. Total strain stays inside about 5 %, so resolution matters far more than travel. Clamps must hold a 50 mm full-thickness strip without creeping over 200 cycles; the face pattern is not prescribed. Conditioning follows ISO 18573 — atmosphere A at 20 °C and 65 % RH, B at 23 °C and 50 % RH, or tropical C at 27 °C and 65 % RH, as the parties agree.

What goes wrong in practice

Grip creep is the dominant error: a strip walking a millimetre through the clamps over 200 cycles is read as permanent elongation the belt does not have. Cutting the sample inside five days, or skipping conditioning, leaves the carcase still relaxing and drifts permanent set high. Extensometer clips walking on soft cover rubber shift the reference length, depressing elastic elongation and inflating modulus. Stopping short of 200 cycles understates permanent elongation, because the belt has not yet settled.

Where this sits among the belting standards

ISO 9856ISO 283ISO 505
MeasuresElastic and permanent elongation, modulusFull thickness tensile strengthTear propagation resistance
Loading200 cycles, below breakOnce, to ruptureTear
AnswersHow much take-up travel?Is the belt to its rating?How does damage spread?
Binding requirementClosed-loop force control at 0.1 HzFrame capacityLow-force resolution

A belt accepted on ISO 283 strength alone has not been shown to behave acceptably in service. Strength says it will not break; this method says how much the conveyor's tensioning gear will have to absorb, which is a different question and often the one that causes trouble after commissioning.

Questions we are asked about this test

What is ISO 9856?

It is the international standard for measuring elastic and permanent elongation of conveyor belting. A full-thickness strip is cycled 200 times between two force levels at 0.1 Hz while elongation is recorded, and the method reports elastic elongation, permanent elongation and elastic modulus in newtons per millimetre of belt width.

What is permanent elongation and why does it matter?

It is the stretch the belt keeps after cycling — the part that does not come back. It matters because the take-up gear on an installed conveyor has to absorb exactly that, so the figure sizes the take-up travel. A belt specified on strength alone can still be wrong for an installation if its permanent elongation exceeds the take-up provided.

What forces does ISO 9856 use?

They scale with the belt rating rather than being fixed. The upper reference force is 10 % of the nominal tensile strength multiplied by the test piece width and the lower is 2 %, so a 200 N/mm belt on a 50 mm strip cycles between roughly 200 N and 1 kN, while a 3150 N/mm textile belt cycles between about 3.2 kN and 15.8 kN. An initial force of 0.5 % is applied first to take up slack.

What kind of machine does ISO 9856 need?

One that can control force, not merely apply it. The binding requirement is closed-loop force control holding an approximately sinusoidal waveform at 0.1 Hz for 200 consecutive cycles at the reference loads. A frame with ample capacity to break the belt is not necessarily able to cycle it, and capacity is the easier half of this specification.

Why must the belt be at least five days old?

Because the carcase is still relaxing after manufacture. Testing sooner measures that relaxation alongside the belt's real elongation behaviour, and the permanent elongation figure comes out higher than the belt will actually show in service.

Why are the covers skimmed back?

Cover rubber carries very little of the load but contributes a good deal of thickness variation, so leaving it on adds scatter without adding signal. The method reduces it to between 0.5 and 1 mm so that what is measured is the carcase, which is what actually resists the stretch.

How do I know a run was valid?

Look at the shape of the elongation record rather than at the final numbers. Clamp creep and a lost extensometer reference both appear as a step in the trace, and both invalidate the run. A curve that looks plausible is not by itself evidence the test was clean — the step is the thing to search for.

Running ISO 9856 on the Series 7200 and Series 9000

Dak verifies against whichever standard the method names, and where a class applies our frames sit a class tighter than it asks.

The method asks forDak supplies
CapacityLoads are modest but must be applied dynamically: the upper reference force is a tenth of the belt's rating across a 50 mm strip, so a 200 N/mm belt cycles between about 200 N and 1 kN, a 3 150 N/mm textile belt between roughly 3,2 kN and 15,8 kN, and a heavy steel-cord belt can take the upper force toward 30-50 kN. The frame requirement is 0,1 Hz sinusoidal control at those loads, not a high break capacity.Load cells from 1 kg to 60 ton on the Series 7200, and 0.5 to 100 kN on the Series 9000
Force accuracyISO 7500-1 Class 3 or better (Class 2 given as an example of 'better') — per the 2003 edition text; not confirmed for the 2016 editionISO 7500-1 Class 0.5 — a class tighter than the method asks
Strain measurementAn extensometer to none — the method sets its own device requirement: measuring length at least 100 mm, accurate to 0,1 mm or better, gauge length at least 100 (extensometer reference length); free length between jaw faces at least 300Certified to ISO 9513 Class 1 and ASTM E83 non-contact video, clip-on and high-elongation
GrippingBelt clamps holding a 50 mm strip over at least 300 mm free length, with a clip-on extensometer set to a reference length of 100 mm or moreOur vice-action grips or self-tightening serrated wedge grips, with V-jaws for round specimens, built to the specimen
EnvironmentConditioning per ISO 18573 — at least 16 h in a controlled-humidity atmosphere; the sample is taken no sooner than five days after belt manufacture3009 series chambers, −150 °C to +400 °C — temperature only

This page describes the method as practised. The governing text is the current edition from the issuing body. Tell us what you are testing and we will answer with the machine, the fixture and a quotation.

Materials tested to it

The test it standardises

Industries that test to it

Other standards explained