Testing standard

ISO 10545-4 Modulus of Rupture Testing of Ceramic Tiles

Ceramic tiles — Part 4: Determination of modulus of rupture and breaking strength

Written and technically reviewed by Dak System Inc. engineeringLast reviewed

ISO 10545-4 bends a ceramic tile in three-point flexure until it breaks, reporting two things: breaking strength, which is a force and scales with thickness, and modulus of rupture, which is a stress and describes the ceramic body. The current edition is ISO 10545-4:2019, the fourth edition, which cancels and replaces ISO 10545-4:2014.

At a glance

Test type
Flexure & bendthe specimen is bent
Published by
ISO
Edition
ISO 10545-4:2019

From the test method to your testing system

Explore the DAK machines already listed for ISO 10545-4, then review the grips, measurement and setup requirements below.

Series 7200 Universal Testing MachineUniversal Testing MachineSeries 7200Explore the machine →Series 9000 Universal Testing MachineUniversal Testing MachineSeries 9000Explore the machine →
Jump to a specific section

01Understand the method

What the test does

A tile is supported on two parallel rods and loaded through a third along its centreline, bending it in three-point flexure until it breaks. Force is applied at a rate that raises the stress in the tile by 1 ± 0,2 N/mm² every second. Two quantities come out: breaking strength, a force, and modulus of rupture, a stress derived from that force and the tile geometry.

What it measures, and why it matters

A floor tile spans the high points of an imperfect bed of adhesive and is walked on, loaded by furniture and occasionally struck. What resists that is its ability to carry a bending load, and this method quantifies it.

The two reported quantities answer different questions, and that is the distinction which matters most here. Breaking strength is the force the tile carried and it scales with thickness: it is the practical number for whether a tile will survive a duty, and what the ISO 13006 product classifications use. Modulus of rupture is a stress, normalised for the tile's dimensions, describing the ceramic body rather than the article. A thin porcelain tile can have a very high modulus of rupture and a modest breaking strength; a thick, coarser tile the reverse.

A specification quoting only modulus of rupture has said something about the body and nothing directly about whether the tile will break underfoot.

02Prepare the specimen and test settings

Whole tiles wherever possible

This is a product test: the article that is sold is, wherever it will fit the apparatus, the article that is broken. That is a stated preference rather than a prohibition on cutting, and the standard prescribes exactly when a tile is cut down.

Specimen
A whole tile wherever possible, glazed face upThe standard says whole tiles shall be tested whenever possible, and that in case of doubt whole-tile results are preferred to results from cut tiles. Cut tiles are noted in the report.
When tiles are cut
Work size thickness 7,5 mm or more: tiles longer than 600 mm are cut to fit the apparatus, no larger than the rod lengthWhere the long-to-short side ratio is 3 or less the original aspect ratio is kept until the long side reaches 600 mm — 1 200 mm × 600 mm is cut to 600 mm × 300 mm. Cuts are held within 10 mm.
Thin tiles
Work size thickness under 7,5 mm: whole only from 324 mm² to 40 000 mm² maximum area; above that, 200 mm × 200 mm specimens are cutFor a tile whose short side is under 200 mm the specimen is that short side by 200 mm, centred on the tile.
Condition
No visible damage or cracks, and not previously tested
Scope
All ceramic tiles
Number of specimens
Tabulated against maximum area and work size thicknessThe tables are the technical revision the 2019 fourth edition introduced. Read that edition rather than the 2014 one on specimen selection.
Drying
To constant mass before testA ceramic body that has absorbed water behaves differently, and untried tiles read low and variably.
Rod covering
Rubber of (50 ± 5) IRHD, measured to ISO 48-2, on both supports and the loading rodThickness and rod diameter are tabulated against the tile's long side. The covering lets a tile that is not perfectly flat bear evenly rather than sitting on one high point.
Replace the rod coverings when they harden
DakA worn or set covering stops distributing the load and the tile breaks at a contact line instead of at its weakest section.

Test speed

Loading
Three-point bending through a central rod
Rate
A stress increase of 1 ± 0,2 N/mm² per secondNot a crosshead speed and not a fixed force rate. The machine has to raise the bending stress in the tile at that rate, which means the force rate is different for every tile size and thickness.
As a force rate
dF/dt = (dR/dt) × 2bh² / 3LDakThe modulus of rupture expression rearranged. b is the tile width, h the thickness and L the span between the support rods.
Worked: 300 mm square floor tile, 9 mm thick
About 58 N/s, or 3,5 kN/minDakSpan 280 mm, after the 10 mm overhang beyond each edge support that Table 1 sets for a tile whose long side is 95 mm or more. The ± 0,2 tolerance gives 46 to 69 N/s. Recompute it for the tile actually being tested.
Span
Set by the tile size, as the method definesSpan appears in the modulus of rupture formula, so a span set for a different tile size changes the reported stress directly.
Reported
Breaking strength in newtons, and modulus of rupture in N/mm²

03Build the test setup on a DAK machine

What the machine must be capable of

What the method asks of the apparatus is a recording pressure gauge accurate to 2,0 % and rubber of (50 ± 5) IRHD on all three rods. It does not cite ISO 7500-1; a frame verified to ISO 7500-1 Class 1 is our recommendation, not a requirement of the standard. Breaking forces run from a few hundred newtons on a thin wall tile to several kilonewtons on thick porcelain, so 10 to 50 kN with a cell chosen for the product range covers it.

The fixture is a three-point bend arrangement, the span set by the tile size. No specimen is larger than the rod length and the longest side the method produces is 600 mm, so a rig spanning 600 mm covers all of it. Rod diameter, rubber thickness and the overhang beyond the supports are tabulated against the long side and are measured rather than assumed.

The rate is a stress rate — 1 ± 0,2 N/mm² per second — so the force rate is different for every tile. Rearranging the modulus of rupture expression gives it: dF/dt = (dR/dt) × 2bh² / 3L. On a 300 mm square floor tile 9 mm thick, spanning 280 mm once the 10 mm overhang the table sets is taken off each end, that is about 58 N/s — 3,5 kN/min — with the tolerance giving 46 to 69 N/s. Recompute it from b, h and L for the tile in hand.

Deflection is not part of the result; the reported quantities come from the breaking force and the geometry.

Grips and fixtures for this method

Three point bending fixture with an adjustable span and a graduated beam
Adjustable spanTJ-124

Three Point Bend Fixture

Two support rods and a central loading rod, all covered in (50 ± 5) IRHD rubber so an imperfectly flat tile bears evenly. Rod diameter, rubber thickness and the overhang are tabulated against the tile's long side. No specimen exceeds the rod length, and the longest side the method produces is 600 mm, so a rig that spans a 600 mm specimen covers the whole of it.

Specifications
Self-identifying

Load Cells

Breaking forces run from a few hundred newtons on a thin wall tile to several kilonewtons on thick porcelain. A cell chosen for the product range keeps the low end resolved rather than sizing everything for the heaviest tile.

Specifications

Running ISO 10545-4 on the Series 7200 and Series 9000

Dak verifies against whichever standard the method names, and where a class applies our frames sit a class tighter than it asks.

The method asks forDak supplies
CapacityA few hundred newtons for a thin wall tile to several kN for thick porcelain floor tileLoad cells from 1 kg to 60 ton on the Series 7200, and 0.5 to 100 kN on the Series 9000
Force accuracynot specified by the method — ISO 10545-4 requires a recording pressure gauge accurate to 2,0 % and cites no force-verification standard; ISO 7500-1 Class 1 is a Dak recommendationISO 7500-1 Class 0.5 — a class tighter than the method asks
GrippingThree-point bend rig sized for a whole tile, with resilient covering on all three rodsOur bend fixtures, built to the specimen
EnvironmentTiles dried to constant mass before test3009 series chambers, −150 °C to +400 °C — temperature only

04Run the test

How the test runs

  1. Select tiles at random from the lot, and cut them down only where the method requires it for that work size and thickness.
  2. Dry to constant mass.
  3. Check the resilient coverings on all three rods.
  4. Set the span for the tile size.
  5. Place the tile glazed face up, centred on the supports with the specified overhang.
  6. Load through the central rod so the stress rises at 1 ± 0,2 N/mm² per second, until the tile breaks.
  7. Record the breaking load.
  8. Measure the minimum thickness along the fracture.
  9. Compute breaking strength and modulus of rupture.
  10. Report both, with the number of tiles.

05Calculate, report and interpret

Calculations

Breaking strengthS

The breaking load multiplied by the span, divided by the specimen width

breaking load
the force at which the tile broke, N
span
the distance between the support rods, mm
width
the tile width, mm

A force-based quantity that scales with thickness. It is what ISO 13006 classifications use and what answers whether a tile will survive a duty.

Modulus of ruptureR

Breaking strength divided by the square of the minimum tile thickness along the fracture

thickness
the minimum thickness measured along the broken edge, mm

A stress, normalised for the tile geometry. It describes the ceramic material rather than the article.

Why the two can point opposite ways

A thin porcelain tile: high modulus of rupture, modest breaking strength

And a thick, coarser tile can be the reverse. Quoting only one of them is where specification errors start.

What the report has to contain

  • Reference to ISO 10545-4 and the edition
  • Tile type, work size and nominal thickness
  • Number of tiles tested
  • Drying condition before test
  • Span used
  • Rod diameters and the resilient covering
  • Loading rate
  • Breaking load for each tile
  • Minimum thickness measured along each fracture
  • Breaking strength and modulus of rupture, both reported

What goes wrong in practice

Rod coverings that have hardened or worn stop distributing the load and the tile breaks at a contact line. A span set for a different tile size changes the modulus of rupture directly, because span is in the formula. Tiles tested without drying read low and variably. And reporting modulus of rupture alone, when the specification wanted breaking strength, is an error that reaches purchase decisions.

06Compare methods and find answers

Breaking strength or modulus of rupture

The single most useful distinction on this page, and the one most often collapsed into a single number.

Breaking strengthModulus of rupture
Is aForce-based quantityStress
Scales with thicknessYesNo — it is normalised for it
DescribesThe tile as an articleThe ceramic body
Used byISO 13006 product classificationMaterial comparison and development
AnswersWill this tile survive the dutyHow good is this body

A specification quoting only modulus of rupture has said something about the ceramic and nothing directly about whether the tile will break underfoot. Where a floor duty is being judged, breaking strength is the quantity that matters.

Questions we are asked about this test

What is ISO 10545-4?

ISO 10545-4 is the international method for the modulus of rupture and breaking strength of ceramic tiles. A whole tile is supported on two rods and loaded through a third at its centreline until it breaks. The current edition is ISO 10545-4:2019, published on 30 April 2019; it is the fourth edition and cancels and replaces ISO 10545-4:2014, which was technically revised.

What is the difference between breaking strength and modulus of rupture?

Breaking strength is a force-based quantity and it scales with tile thickness — it answers whether a particular tile will survive a particular duty, and it is what the ISO 13006 product classifications use. Modulus of rupture is a stress, normalised for the tile geometry, and it describes the ceramic body rather than the article. A thin porcelain tile can have a very high modulus of rupture and a modest breaking strength, and a thick coarser tile the reverse.

Which one should a specification quote?

For a floor or wall duty, breaking strength, because that is the question being asked: will this tile carry the load. Modulus of rupture belongs in body development and material comparison. A specification quoting only modulus of rupture has characterised the ceramic and left the article unspecified, and it is a common enough error to be worth checking before an order rather than after a failure.

Are whole tiles tested, or cut specimens?

Whole tiles wherever possible, and the standard is explicit that in case of doubt whole-tile results are preferred to results from cut tiles — because the tile as sold, with its glaze, its edges, its thickness variation and its as-fired flatness, is what has to survive service. It is a preference rather than a prohibition, though, and the standard prescribes cutting where a tile will not fit the apparatus: tiles 7,5 mm thick or more and longer than 600 mm are cut down, keeping the original aspect ratio until the long side reaches 600 mm, and tiles thinner than 7,5 mm above 40 000 mm² in maximum area are cut to 200 mm × 200 mm. Cuts are held within 10 mm and any cut tile is noted in the report.

Why do the rods have a resilient covering?

Because a fired tile is never perfectly flat. On bare steel rods a slightly bowed tile bears on two or three high points and breaks at one of them, which measures the flatness rather than the strength. A resilient covering of specified dimensions spreads the contact so the tile is loaded along a line. Those coverings harden and wear, and replacing them is routine maintenance, not a repair.

Does the span matter to the result?

Directly. Span appears in the breaking strength expression and therefore in the modulus of rupture derived from it. The method sets the span from the tile size, and a fixture left at the setting used for the last product will produce numbers that are internally consistent and wrong. Span is checked with the tile format, every time the format changes.

What machine does it need?

The standard's own apparatus requirements are a recording pressure gauge accurate to 2,0 % and rubber of (50 ± 5) IRHD on all three rods, measured to ISO 48-2; it does not cite ISO 7500-1 at all. Our recommendation is a frame of 10 to 50 kN verified to ISO 7500-1 Class 1 with a load cell chosen for the product range, which is a house recommendation rather than a requirement of the method. The constraint is usually the fixture: it must hold the correct span with rods of the tabulated diameter and covering. Because no specimen is larger than the rod length and the longest side the method produces is 600 mm, a rig that spans a 600 mm specimen covers every tile format the standard defines.

Materials tested to it

The test it standardises

Industries that test to it

Other standards explained

Planning ISO 10545-4 testing?

Discuss your specimen, test requirements and reporting needs with DAK engineering.

Discuss your test setup →

This page describes the method as practised. The governing text is the current edition from the issuing body. Tell us what you are testing and we will answer with the machine, the fixture and a quotation.