Self-identifying
Load Cells
Cross tension forces are markedly lower than shear forces on the same joint, often by a factor of two or three. A load cell sized for the joint rather than the frame is what keeps the peak resolved.
SpecificationsTesting standard
ISO 14272 Cross Tension Testing of Resistance Spot and Projection Welds
Resistance welding — Destructive testing of welds — Specimen dimensions and procedure for cross tension testing of resistance spot and embossed projection welds
Written and technically reviewed by Dak System Inc. engineeringLast reviewed
ISO 14272 welds two strips together in a cross and pulls them apart through the thickness of the sheet, so the spot weld is opened rather than sheared. The maximum force is the cross tension force, and its ratio to the tensile shear force on the same joint is a working measure of weld ductility. The current edition is ISO 14272:2016.
At a glance
- Test type
- Tensile — the specimen is pulled apart
- Published by
- ISO
- Edition
- ISO 14272:2016
- Material
- Metals, alloys & welds
- Runs on
- Series 7200 and Series 9000
From the test method to your testing system
Explore the DAK machines already listed for ISO 14272, then review the grips, measurement and setup requirements below.
Universal Testing MachineSeries 7200Explore the machine →
Universal Testing MachineSeries 9000Explore the machine →Jump to a specific section
01Understand the method
What the test does
Two strips are spot welded together in a cross, one over the other at right angles, and each is bolted into a fixture that pulls it away from the other through the thickness of the sheet. The weld is opened rather than sheared, and the maximum force the joint carries is the cross tension force. The specimen is held by its four arms in a dedicated jig, not by grips on the sheet, because the load has to be applied normal to the weld and a flat grip cannot do that.
What it measures, and why it matters
Cross tension loads a spot weld in its weakest direction. Where tensile shear asks how much in-plane load the joint carries, cross tension asks how well the nugget resists being pulled apart — closer to a crash, where sheets peel and pry rather than slide past one another.
The ratio of cross tension force to tensile shear force on the same joint is a working measure of weld ductility. High shear with low cross tension is the signature of a hard, brittle nugget: strong in its best direction, fragile in its worst. That combination is common in advanced high-strength steels, where the alloying that gives the sheet its strength gives the weld a martensitic nugget, and it is what a crash structure must not have. This is the test that finds it.
02Prepare the specimen and test settings
The cross specimen
The specimen is held by its four arms in a jig, not by grips on the sheet, because the load has to arrive normal to the weld.
- Joint
- One spot or embossed projection weld at the intersection of two strips
- Material
- Any metallic material
- Sheet thickness
- 0.5 mm to 3 mmLower than the 10 mm of ISO 14273, because the arms are bolted flat into the jig and thicker sheet stops behaving as the geometry assumes.
- Maximum weld diameter
- 7√t, with t the sheet thickness in mm
- Arrangement
- Two strips at right angles, welded at the centre of the intersection
- Fixing
- Clearance holes in each arm for the fixture bolts
- Coating
- Left on — never removed before testPractice
- Check the arms are square before welding
- DakA cross that is a few degrees out loads the nugget partly in peel. The force comes out low and nothing in the record says why.
Test speed
- Loading
- Continuous tensile loading normal to the sheet plane, to failure
- Rate
- Not fixed by the method — the laboratory sets it and reports itClause 5 controls the machine, the force accuracy and the temperature, not the rate. Fix it and hold it constant across any comparison.
- Force accuracy
- ISO 7500-1, with force measured to ±1 % or better
- Temperature
- Room temperature
- Load–displacement diagram
- Required alongside the peak forceIt is the record of how the joint deformed, and the standard asks for it explicitly.
- Reported
- Maximum force, in N or kN, plus the failure mode
- Sampling rate
- High enough to catch an abrupt peakDak
03Build the test setup on a DAK machine
What the machine must be capable of
Cross tension forces on thin sheet are lower than shear forces on the same joint, often by two or three times, so a 50 kN frame is ample for most automotive work and low-end resolution matters more than capacity.
The method sets no loading rate. Its procedure clause controls everything else: a machine meeting ISO 7500-1 with force to ±1 % or better, room temperature, the strength taken from the maximum force, a load–displacement diagram alongside it, and failure mode and weld diameter recorded to ISO 17677-1. The rate is the laboratory's to fix and record, and it must hold across any set being compared. No extensometer is needed, though the data rate must catch an abrupt peak.
The fixture makes or breaks this test. Two mating plates, each bolted to one arm pair of the cross, connect to the machine through pins or clevises so the load line passes through the weld and the assembly self-aligns. A jig stiff in the wrong place forces a bending moment into the joint and the result drifts low. It is made to the standard's drawing for the sheet thickness tested, and Dak builds fixtures of this kind to the specimen and to the method.
The fixture this method needs
Running ISO 14272 on the Series 7200 and Series 9000
Dak verifies against whichever standard the method names, and where a class applies our frames sit a class tighter than it asks.
| The method asks for | Dak supplies | |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | Lower than the tensile shear force on the same joint, often by a factor of two or three; a 50 kN frame covers automotive sheet | Load cells from 1 kg to 60 ton on the Series 7200, and 0.5 to 100 kN on the Series 9000 |
| Force accuracy | ISO 7500-1 Class 1 | ISO 7500-1 Class 0.5 — a class tighter than the method asks |
| Gripping | A bolted cross-tension jig taking the four arms of the cross specimen, connected through pins or clevises so it self-aligns | Our a fixture built for this method, built to the specimen |
| Environment | Ambient laboratory conditions; no conditioning atmosphere is specified | 3009 series chambers, −150 °C to +400 °C — temperature only |
04Run the test
How the test runs
- Cut the two strips and drill the fixture clearance holes.
- Assemble them at right angles and weld at the centre of the intersection.
- Check the arms are square and the weld is central.
- Measure and record sheet thickness and weld diameter.
- Bolt one pair of arms to each half of the cross-tension jig.
- Tighten the bolts evenly, to the same torque on every arm.
- Connect the jig halves to the machine through pins or clevises so the assembly can self-align.
- Load continuously to failure at a fixed, recorded rate — the method leaves the figure to the laboratory.
- Record the maximum force.
- Classify the failure mode and report it with the force.
Uneven bolt torque is the fault that spoils this test most often. Arms that lift under load turn a normal tensile load into a partial peel, and the number that results is low, plausible and wrong. Worn bolt holes in the jig do the same thing gradually enough that nobody notices.
05Calculate, report and interpret
Calculations
Cross tension force—
The maximum force recorded before the joint fails
A force, not a stress, for the same reason as tensile shear: the nugget area is unknown until the weld is destroyed.
Ductility ratio—
Cross tension force divided by tensile shear force on the same joint
- cross tension force
- peak force from this method, N
- tensile shear force
- peak force from ISO 14273 on an equivalent joint, N
Not defined by the standard, and widely used. A high shear force with a low cross tension force is the signature of a hard, brittle nugget — strong along the sheet and fragile through it.
Why crash work needs this test—
Crash loading peels and pries; it does not shear cleanly
A joint can pass in tensile shear and fail here. The shear figure alone is not evidence of crash performance.
What the report has to contain
- Reference to ISO 14272 and the edition
- Parent material, grade, coating and thickness of both strips
- Welding parameters: current, weld time, electrode force and geometry
- Strip width, arm length and hole positions
- Weld diameter where measured, and how
- Test rate
- Maximum force for each specimen
- Failure mode for each specimen
- Mean and the number of specimens
- Where a shear figure is quoted alongside, the standard it came from
What goes wrong in practice
Bolts left loose, or tightened unevenly, let the arms lift and turn a normal load into a partial peel. Arms that are not square do the same. Fixture wear around the bolt holes is a slow version of the same fault, easy to miss because it degrades gradually. Letting the rate drift between batches, when the method leaves it open, spoils a comparison another way. As with the other two methods, recording the force without the failure mode discards half the result: a button pull-out and an interfacial fracture at the same force describe two different welds.
06Compare methods and find answers
Cross tension against tensile shear
Two directions on the same joint. The pair is more informative than either alone, and the pairing is the point.
| Cross tension (ISO 14272) | Tensile shear (ISO 14273) | |
|---|---|---|
| Load direction | Through the sheet thickness | Along the plane of the sheets |
| Nugget loaded | In its weakest direction | In its strongest direction |
| Thickness covered | 0.5 mm to 3 mm | 0.5 mm to 10 mm |
| Held by | A bolted cross-tension jig | Flat grips with packing shims |
| Typical force | Lower, often by a factor of two or three | Higher |
| Answers | Is the nugget ductile | Is the joint strong enough |
Advanced high-strength steels are where the two diverge most. The alloying that gives the sheet its strength can give the weld a martensitic nugget: excellent in shear, poor in cross tension. A crash structure specified on shear results alone has not been tested for the loading it will actually see.
Questions we are asked about this test
What is ISO 14272?
ISO 14272 is the international method for cross tension testing of resistance spot and embossed projection welds. Two strips are welded together in a cross and each is bolted into a fixture that pulls it away from the other through the thickness of the sheet, so the weld is opened rather than sheared. The current edition is ISO 14272:2016, issued with a corrected version dated 1 September 2016.
Why not just run tensile shear?
Because tensile shear loads a spot weld in its strongest direction. Cross tension loads it in its weakest, which is much closer to what happens in a crash, where sheets pry and peel apart rather than sliding past one another. A joint can pass comfortably in shear and fail in cross tension, and that combination is common enough in advanced high-strength steels that shear results alone are not evidence of crash performance.
What does the ratio of cross tension to shear force tell you?
It is a working measure of weld ductility, though the standard does not define it. A high shear force with a low cross tension force means a hard, brittle nugget: strong along the sheet, fragile through it. That pattern points at the nugget metallurgy — often martensite formed by rapid quenching through the copper electrodes — rather than at nugget size, and it is a reason to look at hold time and post-weld tempering.
Why does it need a jig rather than grips?
Because the load has to arrive normal to the weld. A flat grip clamped on the sheet can only pull along the sheet. The cross-tension fixture is two mating plates, each bolted to one opposing pair of arms, connected to the machine through pins or clevises so the assembly can self-align on the weld. Where a specimen falls outside a published fixture, Dak builds the fixture to the specimen and to the method.
What is the most common way this test goes wrong?
Bolt torque. Arms that are loose, or tightened unevenly, lift as the load builds, and a normal tensile load becomes a partial peel. The recorded force drops and the failure mode changes, so the result reads as a bad weld rather than a bad set-up. Worn bolt holes in the jig produce the same error slowly enough that it is usually blamed on the material.
What machine does it need?
A 50 kN frame is ample for most automotive sheet, because cross tension forces are lower than shear forces on the same joint. Force accuracy to ISO 7500-1 Class 1 is the normal requirement and low-end resolution matters more than capacity. The data rate has to be fast enough to catch an abrupt peak, since a spot weld gives no warning before it goes. The method sets no loading rate — it fixes the machine, the ±1 % force accuracy, room temperature, the peak force and the load–displacement diagram — so choose a rate, record it, and keep it the same across everything being compared.
Is the failure mode as important as the force?
Yes, and on this test more than on the others. A button pull-out and an interfacial fracture recorded at the same peak force describe two entirely different welds: the first tore the parent sheet, the second parted across the weld face. Cross tension is the loading most likely to expose an interfacial failure that a shear test passed, so a report that gives force without failure mode has thrown away the finding.
Related
Materials tested to it
The test it standardises
Industries that test to it
Planning ISO 14272 testing?
Discuss your specimen, test requirements and reporting needs with DAK engineering.
This page describes the method as practised. The governing text is the current edition from the issuing body. Tell us what you are testing and we will answer with the machine, the fixture and a quotation.