Testing standard
Particleboards and fibreboards — Determination of tensile strength perpendicular to the plane of the board
Written and technically reviewed by Dak System Inc. engineeringLast reviewed
EN 319 bonds a 50 mm square of particleboard, fibreboard or cement-bonded particleboard between two metal blocks and pulls them apart, loading the board in tension at right angles to its plane. The result is the internal bond, and it is the most sensitive single indicator of whether the panel was pressed and cured properly. The edition in force is EN 319:1993.
From the test method to your testing system
Explore the DAK machines already listed for EN 319, then review the grips, measurement and setup requirements below.
Universal Testing MachineSeries 7200Explore the machine →
Universal Testing MachineSeries 9000Explore the machine →01Understand the method
A square specimen is cut from the panel — particleboard, fibreboard or cement-bonded particleboard — and bonded, face and back, to a pair of steel or aluminium alloy blocks. The blocks are pulled apart so that the specimen is loaded in tension at right angles to the plane of the board, and a uniformly distributed tensile force is applied until rupture.
The result is the tensile strength perpendicular to the plane, almost always called **internal bond**, or IB.
A particleboard or fibreboard is a mat of wood particles or fibres held together by adhesive. Internal bond measures how well that adhesive is doing its job through the thickness of the board, and it is the most sensitive single indicator of whether the panel was made properly.
Resin dosage, mat moisture, press time, press temperature and degree of cure all show up here before they show anywhere else. A board can have acceptable bending strength and poor internal bond, because bending is dominated by the dense surface layers while internal bond is governed by the weak core.
Commercially it does two things. It is the works control test that tells a press operator whether the cycle is right, and it is the property that panel product standards — EN 312 and EN 622 — set requirements against for each class and thickness.
It also finds delamination-prone board. A panel that will blister in service, or that will fail at a screw held only by the core, usually fails here first.
02Prepare the specimen and test settings
The bond to the steel has to be stronger than the bond inside the board. That single requirement governs almost everything about specimen preparation.
A failure at the adhesive interface is an invalid test, not a low internal bond. Those specimens are rejected and repeated, and the report says how many — otherwise a poor gluing session reads as a poor board.
03Build the test setup on a DAK machine
Internal bond strengths are low — a few tenths of a megapascal, which on a 50 mm square specimen is a few hundred newtons to about a kilonewton. A 5 to 10 kN frame with a load cell chosen for that range and force accuracy to ISO 7500-1 Class 1 is right; resolution at the bottom of the range matters far more than capacity.
Alignment matters more than anything else. The blocks have to be pulled along a common axis through the centre of the specimen, so self-aligning connections — a universal joint, a ball-and-socket or a pin at each end — are used. Any eccentricity peels one corner instead of loading the whole area in uniform tension, and the result falls.
Loading is timed, not speed-set: the rate is adjusted so maximum load is reached within 60 ± 30 s. On the 2 500 mm² specimen the method fixes, a board of 0,35 N/mm² internal bond breaks at about 875 N — a window of roughly 10 to 30 N/s, with 15 N/s hitting the 60 s target.
The connection between machine and specimen has to be self-aligning, so the two bonded blocks are pulled along a common axis through the centre of the specimen. Any eccentricity peels a corner instead of loading the whole 50 mm square in uniform tension.
SpecificationsInternal bond is typically a few tenths of a megapascal, which on a 50 mm square is a few hundred newtons to about a kilonewton. Resolution at the bottom of the range decides whether this test is usable; capacity is irrelevant.
SpecificationsDak verifies against whichever standard the method names, and where a class applies our frames sit a class tighter than it asks.
| The method asks for | Dak supplies | |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | Low — a few hundred newtons to about 1 kN on a 50 mm square specimen | Load cells from 1 kg to 60 ton on the Series 7200, and 0.5 to 100 kN on the Series 9000 |
| Force accuracy | ISO 7500-1 Class 1 | ISO 7500-1 Class 0.5 — a class tighter than the method asks |
| Gripping | Two 50 mm square steel or aluminium alloy blocks bonded to the specimen, pulled through self-aligning connections | Our a fixture built for this method, built to the specimen |
| Environment | Conditioned before test; internal bond moves with moisture content | 3009 series chambers, −150 °C to +400 °C — temperature only |
04Run the test
05Calculate, report and interpret
Maximum load divided by the bonded area
Reported in N/mm². Typical values are a few tenths of a megapascal, which is why a specimen cut out of square matters — the area divided by is not the area loaded.
Resin dosage, mat moisture, press time, temperature and cure all show here first
It is governed by the weak core, where all of those variables have their largest effect.
Bending is carried by the dense surface layers
A board with an under-cured core can bend acceptably and still fail at a screw held only by that core, or blister in service.
Adhesive failures reported as low results are the classic error and always understate the board. Adhesive that has penetrated the surface reinforces the specimen and overstates it. Misalignment between the blocks peels rather than pulls. And a specimen cut out of square gives a bonded area that is not what the strength was divided by.
06Compare methods and find answers
Four European methods describe a wood-based panel, and each one has to be read alongside the others.
| EN 319 | EN 310 | EN 322 | EN 323 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Measures | Internal bond | Bending stiffness and strength | Moisture content | Density |
| Governed by | The weak core | The dense faces | Conditioning and storage | The whole board |
| Finds | Press and resin faults | Structural adequacy | Why the others moved | Why the others moved |
| Product standard | EN 312, EN 622 | EN 312, EN 622 | Supporting | Supporting |
An internal bond figure without the moisture content and density it was measured at is difficult to argue with or against. Both move the result, and both are cheap to determine on the same board.
EN 319 is the European method for determining the tensile strength perpendicular to the plane of particleboards, fibreboards and cement-bonded particleboards — the property universally called internal bond, or IB. A 50 mm square specimen is bonded between two metal blocks and pulled apart until it ruptures. The edition in force is EN 319:1993, which has not been revised since publication, though BSI lists BS EN 319:1993 as under review.
Because it responds to almost everything that can go wrong in a press. Resin dosage, mat moisture, press time, press temperature and degree of cure all show up in the internal bond before they show up in any other property, because the weak core of the board is where they have their largest effect. It is the works control test that tells a press operator whether the cycle is right, and it is what product standards specify per grade and thickness.
Routinely, and that is the reason both exist. Bending is dominated by the dense surface layers of a panel, so a board with a weak, under-cured core can produce perfectly acceptable modulus of elasticity and bending strength. The internal bond is governed by that core. Boards that will blister in service, or fail at a screw held only by the core, usually fail here first while looking sound in bending.
The test is invalid and is repeated. A failure at the adhesive interface means the bond to the block was weaker than the bond inside the board, so the board's internal bond has not been measured — only a lower limit on it. Recording those as low results understates the panel, sometimes badly, and a run with several such failures usually points at the gluing procedure rather than the board.
To stop it soaking in. An adhesive that penetrates the board surface impregnates and reinforces part of the very structure being measured, so the internal bond comes out high. That is the opposite failure to a glue-line separation and it is harder to detect, because the specimen fails in the board exactly as it should. A hot-melt that sets before it can migrate is the usual answer.
Because the method calls for a uniformly distributed tensile force, and a 50 mm square is small enough that a few millimetres of eccentricity is a large proportion of it. Off-axis loading peels one corner of the specimen progressively instead of loading the whole area at once, and the recorded strength falls. Self-aligning connections at both ends — a universal joint, a ball-and-socket or a pin — are what keep the load path through the centre.
A small frame with excellent low-end resolution. Internal bond is typically a few tenths of a megapascal, which on a 50 mm square specimen is a few hundred newtons to about a kilonewton, so a 5 to 10 kN frame with a load cell chosen for that range and force accuracy to ISO 7500-1 Class 1 is right. Capacity is not the issue; alignment and resolution are.
Discuss your specimen, test requirements and reporting needs with DAK engineering.
This page describes the method as practised. The governing text is the current edition from the issuing body. Tell us what you are testing and we will answer with the machine, the fixture and a quotation.
